Literature DB >> 21278821

A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Seung W Choi1, Matthew W Grady, Barbara G Dodd.   

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to introduce a new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. The predicted standard error reduction stopping rule (PSER) uses the predictive posterior variance to determine the reduction in standard error that would result from the administration of additional items. The performance of the PSER was compared to that of the minimum standard error stopping rule and a modified version of the minimum information stopping rule in a series of simulated adaptive tests, drawn from a number of item pools. Results indicate that the PSER makes efficient use of CAT item pools, administering fewer items when predictive gains in information are small and increasing measurement precision when information is abundant.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21278821      PMCID: PMC3028267          DOI: 10.1177/0013164410387338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  8 in total

1.  Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales.

Authors:  J E Ware; J B Bjorner; M Kosinski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment.

Authors:  Jakob Bue Bjorner; Chih-Hung Chang; David Thissen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact.

Authors:  John E Ware; Mark Kosinski; Jakob B Bjorner; Martha S Bayliss; Alice Batenhorst; Carl G H Dahlöf; Stewart Tepper; Andrew Dowson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Seung W Choi; Steven P Reise; Paul A Pilkonis; Ron D Hays; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Differentiating the mood and anxiety disorders: a quadripartite model.

Authors:  David Watson
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 18.561

6.  Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment.

Authors:  Robert D Gibbons; David J Weiss; David J Kupfer; Ellen Frank; Andrea Fagiolini; Victoria J Grochocinski; Dulal K Bhaumik; Angela Stover; R Darrell Bock; Jason C Immekus
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen M Haley; Barbara Gandek; Hilary Siebens; Randie M Black-Schaffer; Samuel J Sinclair; Wei Tao; Wendy J Coster; Pengsheng Ni; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: a simulation study.

Authors:  William Gardner; Katherine Shear; Kelly J Kelleher; Kathleen A Pajer; Oommen Mammen; Daniel Buysse; Ellen Frank
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 3.630

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Grooming a CAT: customizing CAT administration rules to increase response efficiency in specific research and clinical settings.

Authors:  Michael A Kallen; Karon F Cook; Dagmar Amtmann; Elizabeth Knowlton; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Variable-Length Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Chun Wang; David J Weiss; Zhuoran Shang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Constructing Shadow Tests in Variable-Length Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Qi Diao; Hao Ren
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-02-20

4.  Quality of Item Pool (QIP) Index: A Novel Approach to Evaluating CAT Item Pool Adequacy.

Authors:  Emre Gönülateş
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Robustness of Adaptive Measurement of Change to Item Parameter Estimation Error.

Authors:  Allison W Cooperman; David J Weiss; Chun Wang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.088

6.  A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and fixed-length short forms for the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-MTM).

Authors:  Dagmar Amtmann; Alyssa M Bamer; Jiseon Kim; Fraser Bocell; Hyewon Chung; Ryoungsun Park; Rana Salem; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Advancing the efficiency and efficacy of patient reported outcomes with multivariate computer adaptive testing.

Authors:  Scott Morris; Mike Bass; Mirinae Lee; Richard E Neapolitan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Testing Versus Fixed Short Forms in Juvenile Myositis.

Authors:  Ruchi N Patel; Valeria G Esparza; Jin-Shei Lai; Elizabeth L Gray; Bryce B Reeve; Rowland W Chang; David Cella; Kaveh Ardalan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.178

9.  Stopping Rules for Computer Adaptive Testing When Item Banks Have Nonuniform Information.

Authors:  Scott B Morris; Michael Bass; Elizabeth Howard; Richard E Neapolitan
Journal:  Int J Test       Date:  2019-07-16

10.  The Accuracy of Computerized Adaptive Testing in Heterogeneous Populations: A Mixture Item-Response Theory Analysis.

Authors:  Richard Sawatzky; Pamela A Ratner; Jacek A Kopec; Amery D Wu; Bruno D Zumbo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.