BACKGROUND: The functional haemodynamic variables pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), and systolic pressure variation (SPV) are widely used to assess haemodynamic status. However, it is not known how these perform during acute lung injury (ALI). This study evaluated the effects of different ventilatory strategies on haemodynamic parameters in pigs with ALI during normovolaemia and hypovolaemia. METHODS:Eight anaesthetized Agroceres pigs [40 (1.9) kg] were instrumented with pulmonary artery, PiCCO, and arterial catheters and ventilated. Three ventilatory settings were randomly assigned for 10 min each: tidal volume (VT) 15 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 5 cm H(2)O, VT 8 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 13 cm H(2)O, or VT 6 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 13 cm H(2)O. Data were collected at each setting at baseline, after ALI (lung lavage+Tween 1.5%), and ALI with hypovolaemia (haemorrhage to 30% of estimated blood volume). RESULTS: At baseline, high VT increased PPV, SVV, and SPV (P<0.05 for all). During ALI, high VT significantly increased PPV and SVV [(P = 0.002 and P = 0.008) respectively.]. After ALI with hypovolaemia, ventilation at VT 6 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 13 cm H(2)O decreased the accuracy of functional haemodynamic variables to predict hypovolaemia, with the exception of PPV (area under the curve 0.875). The parameters obtained by PiCCO were less influenced by ventilatory changes. CONCLUSIONS: VT is the ventilatory parameter which influences functional haemodynamics the most. During ventilation with low VT and high PEEP, most functional variables are less able to accurately predict hypovolaemia secondary to haemorrhage, with the exception of PPV.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The functional haemodynamic variables pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), and systolic pressure variation (SPV) are widely used to assess haemodynamic status. However, it is not known how these perform during acute lung injury (ALI). This study evaluated the effects of different ventilatory strategies on haemodynamic parameters in pigs with ALI during normovolaemia and hypovolaemia. METHODS: Eight anaesthetized Agroceres pigs [40 (1.9) kg] were instrumented with pulmonary artery, PiCCO, and arterial catheters and ventilated. Three ventilatory settings were randomly assigned for 10 min each: tidal volume (VT) 15 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 5 cm H(2)O, VT 8 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 13 cm H(2)O, or VT 6 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 13 cm H(2)O. Data were collected at each setting at baseline, after ALI (lung lavage+Tween 1.5%), and ALI with hypovolaemia (haemorrhage to 30% of estimated blood volume). RESULTS: At baseline, high VT increased PPV, SVV, and SPV (P<0.05 for all). During ALI, high VT significantly increased PPV and SVV [(P = 0.002 and P = 0.008) respectively.]. After ALI with hypovolaemia, ventilation at VT 6 ml kg(-1) and PEEP 13 cm H(2)O decreased the accuracy of functional haemodynamic variables to predict hypovolaemia, with the exception of PPV (area under the curve 0.875). The parameters obtained by PiCCO were less influenced by ventilatory changes. CONCLUSIONS:VT is the ventilatory parameter which influences functional haemodynamics the most. During ventilation with low VT and high PEEP, most functional variables are less able to accurately predict hypovolaemia secondary to haemorrhage, with the exception of PPV.
Authors: Carlos Ferrando; Marisa García; Andrea Gutierrez; Jose A Carbonell; Gerardo Aguilar; Marina Soro; Francisco J Belda Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas; Alexandre Marini Ísola; Augusto Manoel de Carvalho Farias; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti; Ana Maria Casati Gama; Antonio Carlos Magalhães Duarte; Arthur Vianna; Ary Serpa Neto; Bruno de Arruda Bravim; Bruno do Valle Pinheiro; Bruno Franco Mazza; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho; Carlos Toufen Júnior; Cid Marcos Nascimento David; Corine Taniguchi; Débora Dutra da Silveira Mazza; Desanka Dragosavac; Diogo Oliveira Toledo; Eduardo Leite Costa; Eliana Bernadete Caser; Eliezer Silva; Fabio Ferreira Amorim; Felipe Saddy; Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Gustavo Faissol Janot de Matos; João Claudio Emmerich; Jorge Luis dos Santos Valiatti; José Mario Meira Teles; Josué Almeida Victorino; Juliana Carvalho Ferreira; Luciana Passuello do Vale Prodomo; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Luiz Claudio Martins; Luis Marcelo Sá Malbouisson; Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira Vargas; Marco Antonio Soares Reis; Marcelo Brito Passos Amato; Marcelo Alcântara Holanda; Marcelo Park; Marcia Jacomelli; Marcos Tavares; Marta Cristina Paulette Damasceno; Murillo Santucci César Assunção; Moyzes Pinto Coelho Duarte Damasceno; Nazah Cherif Mohamed Youssef; Paulo José Zimmermann Teixeira; Pedro Caruso; Péricles Almeida Delfino Duarte; Octavio Messeder; Raquel Caserta Eid; Ricardo Goulart Rodrigues; Rodrigo Francisco de Jesus; Ronaldo Adib Kairalla; Sandra Justino; Sergio Nogueira Nemer; Simone Barbosa Romero; Verônica Moreira Amado Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2014 Jul-Sep
Authors: Carlos Ferrando; Fernando Suárez-Sipmann; Andrea Gutierrez; Gerardo Tusman; Jose Carbonell; Marisa García; Laura Piqueras; Desamparados Compañ; Susanie Flores; Marina Soro; Alicia Llombart; Francisco Javier Belda Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Alexandre Hideaki Oshiro; Denise Aya Otsuki; Marcelo Waldir M Hamaji; Kaleizu T Rosa; Keila Kazue Ida; Denise T Fantoni; José Otavio Costa Auler Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: F G R Freitas; A T Bafi; A P M Nascente; M Assunção; B Mazza; L C P Azevedo; F R Machado Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 9.166