Literature DB >> 21277993

Genotoxicity and potential carcinogenicity of cyanobacterial toxins - a review.

Bojana Zegura1, Alja Straser, Metka Filipič.   

Abstract

The occurrence of cyanobacterial blooms has increased significantly in many regions of the world in the last century due to water eutrophication. These blooms are hazardous to humans, animals, and plants due to the production of cyanotoxins, which can be classified in five different groups: hepatotoxins, neurotoxins, cytotoxins, dermatotoxins, and irritant toxins (lipopolysaccharides). There is evidence that certain cyanobacterial toxins are genotoxic and carcinogenic; however, the mechanisms of their potential carcinogenicity are not well understood. The most frequently occurring and widespread cyanotoxins in brackish and freshwater blooms are the cyclic heptapeptides, i.e., microcystins (MCs), and the pentapeptides, i.e., nodularins (NODs). The main mechanism associated with potential carcinogenic activity of MCs and NOD is the inhibition of protein phosphatases, which leads to the hyperphosphorylation of cellular proteins, which is considered to be associated with their tumor-promoting activity. Apart from this, MCs and NOD induce increased formation of reactive oxygen species and, consequently, oxidative DNA damage. There is also evidence that MCs and NOD induce micronuclei, and NOD was shown to have aneugenic activity. Both cyanotoxins interfere with DNA damage repair pathways, which, along with DNA damage, is an important factor involved in the carcinogenicity of these agents. Furthermore, these toxins increase the expression of TNF-α and early-response genes, including proto-oncogenes, genes involved in the response to DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. Rodent studies indicate that MCs and NOD are tumor promotors, whereas NOD is thought to have also tumor-initiating activity. Another cyanobacterial toxin, cylindrospermopsin (CYN), which has been neglected for a long time, is lately being increasingly found in the freshwater environment. The principal mechanism of its toxicity is the irreversible inhibition of protein synthesis. It is pro-genotoxic, and metabolic activation by cytochrome P-450 enzymes is needed for its genotoxic activity. In metabolically competent cells, it induces DNA strand breaks and exerts clastogenic and aneugenic activity. In addition, CYN increased the expression of p53 regulated genes involved in cell cycle arrest, DNA damage repair, and apoptosis. It also has cell transforming potential, and limited preliminary rodent studies indicate that CYN could have tumor-initiating activity. In 2010, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified MCLR as possible human carcinogen (Group 2B). Although there is not enough available information for the classification of other cyanobacterial toxins, the existing data from in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that NOD and especially CYN may be even more hazardous than MCLR to human and animal health. In addition in the environment, cyanobacterial toxins occur in complex mixtures as well as together with other anthropogenic contaminants, and numerous studies showed that the toxic/genotoxic potential of the extracts from cyanobacterial scums is higher than that of purified toxins. This means that the mixtures of toxins to which humans are exposed may pose higher health risks than estimated from the toxicological data of a single toxin. Future research efforts should focus on the elucidation of the carcinogenic potential of NOD, CYN, and the mixture of cyanobacterial extracts, as well as on the identification of possible novel toxins.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277993     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  36 in total

1.  Cyanobacteria blooms produce teratogenic retinoic acids.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wu; Jieqiong Jiang; Yi Wan; John P Giesy; Jianying Hu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) on the morphology and viability of 3T3 murine fibroblasts.

Authors:  Cindy Bandala; Juan Luis Terán-Melo; Maricruz Anaya-Ruiz; Cesar Miguel Mejía-Barradas; Rene Domínguez-Rubio; Paloma De la Garza-Montano; Alfonso Alfaro-Rodríguez; Eleazar Lara-Padilla
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Short-term uptake of microcystin-LR by Coregonus lavaretus: GST activity and genotoxicity.

Authors:  Benoît Sotton; Alain Devaux; Nicolas Givaudan; Jean Guillard; Isabelle Domaizon; Sylvie Bony; Orlane Anneville
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Chitosan-cellulose composite materials: preparation, characterization and application for removal of microcystin.

Authors:  Chieu D Tran; Simon Duri; Ambra Delneri; Mladen Franko
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Microcystin-tolerant Rhizobium protects plants and improves nitrogen assimilation in Vicia faba irrigated with microcystin-containing waters.

Authors:  Majida Lahrouni; Khalid Oufdou; Fatima El Khalloufi; Loubna Benidire; Susann Albert; Michael Göttfert; Miguel A Caviedes; Ignacio D Rodriguez-Llorente; Brahim Oudra; Eloísa Pajuelo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Genetic characterization of Microcystis aeruginosa isolates from Portuguese freshwater systems.

Authors:  Cristiana Moreira; Vitor Vasconcelos; Agostinho Antunes
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Algicidal Activity of Streptomyces eurocidicus JXJ-0089 Metabolites and Their Effects on Microcystis Physiology.

Authors:  Bing-Huo Zhang; Zhang-Gui Ding; Han-Quan Li; Xiao-Zhen Mou; Yu-Qin Zhang; Jian-Yuan Yang; En-Min Zhou; Wen-Jun Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Oral exposure to environmental cyanobacteria toxins: Implications for cancer risk.

Authors:  Brenda Y Hernandez; Xuemei Zhu; Patrick Sotto; Yvette Paulino
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 9.  Is neurodegenerative disease a long-latency response to early-life genotoxin exposure?

Authors:  Glen E Kisby; Peter S Spencer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Hepatotoxic seafood poisoning (HSP) due to microcystins: a threat from the ocean?

Authors:  Katerina Vareli; Walter Jaeger; Anastasia Touka; Stathis Frillingos; Evangelos Briasoulis; Ioannis Sainis
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.