Literature DB >> 21277672

Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

Christophe Vayssière1, Guillaume Benoist, Béatrice Blondel, Philippe Deruelle, Romain Favre, Denis Gallot, Paul Jabert, Didier Lemery, Olivier Picone, Jean-Claude Pons, Francis Puech, Edwin Quarello, Laurent Salomon, Thomas Schmitz, Marie-Victoire Senat, Loïc Sentilhes, Agnes Simon, Julien Stirneman, Françoise Vendittelli, Norbert Winer, Yves Ville.   

Abstract

The rate of twin deliveries in 2008 was 15.6 per 1000 in France, an increase of approximately 80% since the beginning of the 1970s. It is recommended that chorionicity be diagnosed as early as possible in twin pregnancies (Professional Consensus). The most relevant signs (close to 100%) are the number of gestational sacs between 7 and 10 weeks and the presence of a lambda sign between 11 and 14 weeks (Professional Consensus). In twin pregnancies, nuchal translucency is the best parameter for evaluating the risk of aneuploidy (Level B). The routine use of serum markers during the first or the second trimester is not recommended (Professional Consensus). In the case of a choice about sampling methods, chorionic villus sampling is recommended over amniocentesis (Professional Consensus). Monthly follow-up by a gynaecologist-obstetrician in an appropriate facility is recommended for dichorionic pregnancies (Professional Consensus). A monthly ultrasound examination including an estimation of fetal weight and umbilical artery Doppler is recommended (Professional Consensus). It is recommended to plan delivery of uncomplicated dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies from 38 weeks and before 40 weeks (Level C). Monthly prenatal consultations and twice-monthly ultrasound are recommended for monochorionic twins (Professional Consensus). It is reasonable to consider delivery from 36 weeks but before 38 weeks+6 days, with intensified monitoring during that time (Professional Consensus). Prenatal care of monochorionic pregnancies must be provided by a physician working in close collaboration with a facility experienced in the management of this type of pregnancy and its complications (Professional Consensus). The increased risk of maternal complications and the high rate of medical interventions justify the immediate and permanent availability of a gynaecologist-obstetrician with experience in the vaginal delivery of twins (Professional Consensus). It is recommended that the maternity ward where delivery takes place have rapid access to blood products (Professional Consensus). Only obstetric history (history of preterm delivery) (Level C) and transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length (Level B) are predictive factors for preterm delivery. No study has shown that the identification by transvaginal sonography (TVS) of a group at risk of preterm delivery makes it possible to reduce the frequency of such deliveries in asymptomatic patients carrying twins (Professional Consensus). It is important to recognize signs of TTTS early to improve the management of these pregnancies (Professional Consensus). Treatment and counseling must be performed in a center that can offer fetoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses (Professional Consensus). This laser treatment is the first-line treatment (Level B). In the absence of complications after laser treatment, planned delivery is recommended from 34 weeks and no later than 37 weeks (Professional Consensus). For delivery, it is desirable for women with a twin pregnancy to have epidural analgesia (Professional Consensus). The studies about the question of mode of delivery have methodological limitations and lack of power. Active management of the delivery of the second twin is recommended to reduce the interval between the births of the two twins (Level C). In the case of non-cephalic presentation, total breech extraction, preceded by internal version manoeuvres if the twin's position is transverse, is associated with the lowest cesarean rates for second twins (Level C). In the case of high and not yet engaged cephalic presentation and if the team is appropriately trained, version by internal manoeuvres followed by total breech extraction is to be preferred to a combination of resumption of pushing, oxytocin perfusion, and artificial rupture of the membranes, because the former strategy appears to be associated with fewer cesareans for the second twin (Level C).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277672     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic value of umbilical and cerebral Doppler in fetal growth restriction: comparison of dichorionic twins and singletons.

Authors:  Sarah Vanlieferinghen; Olivia Anselem; Camille Le Ray; Yao Shen; Louis Marcellin; François Goffinet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fiona Cheong-See; Ewoud Schuit; David Arroyo-Manzano; Asma Khalil; Jon Barrett; K S Joseph; Elizabeth Asztalos; Karien Hack; Liesbeth Lewi; Arianne Lim; Sophie Liem; Jane E Norman; John Morrison; C Andrew Combs; Thomas J Garite; Kimberly Maurel; Vicente Serra; Alfredo Perales; Line Rode; Katharina Worda; Anwar Nassar; Mona Aboulghar; Dwight Rouse; Elizabeth Thom; Fionnuala Breathnach; Soichiro Nakayama; Francesca Maria Russo; Julian N Robinson; Jodie M Dodd; Roger B Newman; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Selphee Tang; Ben Willem J Mol; Javier Zamora; Basky Thilaganathan; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-09-06

Review 3.  What is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm cephalic/non-cephalic twin pairs? A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Catherine Dagenais; Anne-Mary Lewis-Mikhael; Marinela Grabovac; Amit Mukerji; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Influence of weight gain, according to Institute of Medicine 2009 recommendation, on spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Paola Algeri; Francesca Pelizzoni; Davide Paolo Bernasconi; Francesca Russo; Maddalena Incerti; Sabrina Cozzolino; Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia; Patrizia Vergani
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Challenges for better care based on the course of maternal body mass index, weight gain and multiple outcome in twin pregnancies: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Hessen/Germany within 15 years.

Authors:  Julia Schubert; Nina Timmesfeld; Kathrin Noever; Birgit Arabin
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Outcomes of 'one-day trial of vaginal delivery of twins' at 36-37 weeks' gestation in Japan.

Authors:  Yuria Haruna; Shunji Suzuki
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-10-15

7.  Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening.

Authors:  B Boyle; J K Morris; R McConkey; E Garne; M Loane; M C Addor; M Gatt; M Haeusler; A Latos-Bielenska; N Lelong; R McDonnell; C Mullaney; M O'Mahony; H Dolk
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 6.531

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.