INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common cause of cryptogenic stroke in patients younger than 55. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been accepted as the reference diagnostic technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), TEE and transcranial Doppler (TCD) in the diagnosis and quantification of patent foramen ovale. METHODS: We studied 134 patients prospectively. Simultaneous TTE with TCD and TEE with TCD were performed, using agitated saline solution to detect right to left shunt. RESULTS: In 93 patients diagnosed with PFO, the shunt was visualized at baseline by TCD in 69% of cases, by TTE in 74% and by TEE in 58%. The Valsalva maneuver produced a similar improvement in shunt diagnosis with all 3 techniques (26%-28%). TTE and TCD showed higher sensitivity (100% vs 97%; non significant difference) than TEE in the diagnosis of PFO (86%; P<.001). TCD performed during TEE did not diagnose 12 (13%) shunts previously diagnosed during TTE. Similarly, TEE underestimated shunt severity. CONCLUSIONS: TTE enables adequate diagnosis and quantification of PFO. TEE is less sensitive and tends to underestimate the severity of the shunt.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common cause of cryptogenic stroke in patients younger than 55. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been accepted as the reference diagnostic technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), TEE and transcranial Doppler (TCD) in the diagnosis and quantification of patent foramen ovale. METHODS: We studied 134 patients prospectively. Simultaneous TTE with TCD and TEE with TCD were performed, using agitated saline solution to detect right to left shunt. RESULTS: In 93 patients diagnosed with PFO, the shunt was visualized at baseline by TCD in 69% of cases, by TTE in 74% and by TEE in 58%. The Valsalva maneuver produced a similar improvement in shunt diagnosis with all 3 techniques (26%-28%). TTE and TCD showed higher sensitivity (100% vs 97%; non significant difference) than TEE in the diagnosis of PFO (86%; P<.001). TCD performed during TEE did not diagnose 12 (13%) shunts previously diagnosed during TTE. Similarly, TEE underestimated shunt severity. CONCLUSIONS: TTE enables adequate diagnosis and quantification of PFO. TEE is less sensitive and tends to underestimate the severity of the shunt.
Authors: Benjamin S Wessler; David M Kent; David E Thaler; Robin Ruthazer; Jennifer S Lutz; Joaquín Serena Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2015-07-11 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Dario Martolini; Rebecca Tanner; Claire Davey; Mehul S Patel; Davide Elia; Helen Purcell; Paolo Palange; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Michael I Polkey Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2014-09-25
Authors: Mohammad Khalid Mojadidi; Jared S Winoker; Scott C Roberts; Pavlos Msaouel; Rubine Gevorgyan; Ronald Zolty Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Alfonso Merante; Pietro Gareri; Alberto Castagna; Norma Maria Marigliano; Mafalda Candigliota; Alessandro Ferraro; Giovanni Ruotolo Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 4.458