Literature DB >> 21277591

Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of 12-year performance.

W R Eric Jamieson1, Friedrich-Christian Riess, Peter J Raudkivi, Jacques Metras, Edward F G Busse, Jacob Goldstein, Guy J Fradet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) was approved in 2000 by the US Food and Drug Administration. Clinical performance was evaluated in 6 centers.
METHODS: From 1994 to 2000, 797 patients (mean age 69 years) had aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 232 (mean 67 years) had mitral valve replacement (MVR). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed with aortic valve replacement (45.4%) and mitral valve replacement (43.5%). Mean follow-ups were 7.5 years for aortic position and 7.3 years for mitral position.
RESULTS: Early mortalities were 2.8% for AVR and 3.0% for MVR. Late mortalities were 4.2%/patient-year for AVR and 5.1%/patient-year for MVR. Overall 12-year survivals were 55.8% ± 3.7% for AVR and 43.9% ± 7.4% for MVR. Twelve-year freedoms from valve-related mortality were 87.1% ± 3.1% for AVR and 82.5% ± 7.7% for MVR. Twelve-year freedoms from reoperation were 84.0% ± 3.3% for AVR and 82.5% ± 7.5% for MVR. Freedoms from structural valve deterioration (SVD) by explant reoperation at 12 years for AVR were 93.3% ± 2.6% for patients at least 60 years old and 75.9% ± 9.3% for patients younger than 60 years. Freedoms from SVD by explant reoperation at 10 years for MVR were 95.3% ± 7.8% for patients at least 70 years old and 84.0% ± 9.3% for patients younger than 70 years. Hemodynamic performance data at 1 year for AVR (sizes 21-27 mm) were mean systolic gradient range 13.7 ± 4.8 to 10.3 ± 3.2 mm Hg and effective orifice area range 1.5 ± 0.3 to 2.5 ± 0.4 cm(2). For MVR (sizes 25-31 mm), data were mean diastolic gradient range 6.7 ± 1.7 to 3.7 ± 0.9 mm Hg and effective orifice area range 1.9 ± 0.3 to 2.4 ± 0.6 cm(2).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall performance of Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis to 12 years is satisfactory. Freedoms from SVD by explant reoperation were most satisfactory for aortic position in patients at least 60 years old and mitral position in patients at least 70 years old. Overall actuarial freedom from SVD by explant reoperation is encouraging for patients with MVR.
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277591     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  Surgical technique of double valve replacement in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Mizuki Sumi; Tsuneo Ariyoshi; Seiji Matsukuma; Shun Nakaji; Koji Hashizume; Naoe Kinoshita; Kiyoyuki Eishi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-11

Review 2.  A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

3.  Subvalvular Pannus Overgrowth after Mosaic Bioprosthesis Implantation in the Aortic Position.

Authors:  Masanori Hirota; Tadashi Isomura; Minoru Yoshida; Chieko Katsumata; Fusahiko Ito; Masazumi Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 4.  Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-31

5.  The Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis: A Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Celiento; Stefania Blasi; Andrea De Martino; Stefano Pratali; Aldo D Milano; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  A Genomics-Based Model for Prediction of Severe Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Calcification.

Authors:  Anastasia V Ponasenko; Maria V Khutornaya; Anton G Kutikhin; Natalia V Rutkovskaya; Anna V Tsepokina; Natalia V Kondyukova; Arseniy E Yuzhalin; Leonid S Barbarash
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

Authors:  Giovanni A Chiariello; Anne-Sophie Beraud; Olivier Vahdat; Jérôme Van Rothem; Olivier Garcia; Philippe Soula; Pierre Berthoumieu; Issam Abouliatim
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

8.  Clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance of Dafodil™ aortic and mitral pericardial bioprosthesis: 1-year results from Dafodil-1 first-in-human trial.

Authors:  C S Hiremath; Anil R Jain; Anurag Garg; Nirmal Gupta; Yugal K Mishra; Zile Singh Meharwal; Nityanand Thakur; Atul A Maslekar; Naman Shastri
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction of Double Valve Re-Replacement Using Bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Yoshimori Araki; Chikao Teramoto; Yasunobu Konishi; Takafumi Terada; Osamu Kawaguchi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.520

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.