Literature DB >> 21277492

Postsurgical imaging of the globe.

Ronald S Swanger1, Alison V Crum, Zachary George Klett, Syed Ahmed Jamal Bokhari.   

Abstract

Interpretation of globe imaging after ophthalmologic surgical intervention, just like postoperative imaging in any location, can create a diagnostic dilemma if the radiologist is not familiar with the type of surgery performed and the nature and location of any implanted devices. Certain implants and devices may create artifacts on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, and some contain ferromagnetic components that may be damaged if inadvertently placed in the magnetic resonance imaging. We review several common ocular surgical procedures, as well as a few orbital surgical procedures and discuss many implants and devices and their appearance on cross-sectional imaging. Familiarity with these procedures and their imaging appearance can diminish the chance of misinterpretation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277492     DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR        ISSN: 0887-2171            Impact factor:   1.875


  2 in total

1.  Clinical applications of high-resolution ocular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Keizo Tanitame; Takashi Sone; Yoshiaki Kiuchi; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Post-operative orbital imaging: a focus on implants and prosthetic devices.

Authors:  Ashok Adams; Kshitij Mankad; Cornelia Poitelea; David H Verity; Indran Davagnanam
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.804

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.