OBJECTIVE: The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults. DESIGN: The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. METHOD: Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65-89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study. RESULTS: Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r=0.42, p=0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion (r=-0.11, p=0.44; r=-0.25, p=0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores (r=0.39, p=0.004), but walking minutes were not (r=0.15, p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults.
OBJECTIVE: The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults. DESIGN: The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. METHOD:Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65-89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study. RESULTS: Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r=0.42, p=0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion (r=-0.11, p=0.44; r=-0.25, p=0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores (r=0.39, p=0.004), but walking minutes were not (r=0.15, p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults.
Authors: Kassia S Beetham; Erin J Howden; David M Small; David R Briskey; Megan Rossi; Nicole Isbel; Jeff S Coombes Journal: Redox Rep Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 4.412
Authors: Anna L Hawkes; Tania A Patrao; John Atherton; Robert S Ware; Craig B Taylor; Adrienne O'Neil; Rachelle Foreman; Brian F Oldenburg Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2013-09
Authors: Shuichi Suetani; Sukanta Saha; Adam Milad; Elizabeth Eakin; James G Scott; John J McGrath Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Kassia S Beetham; Rathika Krishnasamy; Tony Stanton; Julian W Sacre; Bettina Douglas; Nicole M Isbel; Jeff S Coombes; Erin J Howden Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Andrea Nathan; Gavin Pereira; Sarah Foster; Paula Hooper; Dick Saarloos; Billie Giles-Corti Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 6.457