Literature DB >> 21276738

Patient-specific endovascular simulation influences interventionalists performing carotid artery stenting procedures.

W I M Willaert1, R Aggarwal, I Van Herzeele, K O'Donoghue, P A Gaines, A W Darzi, F E Vermassen, N J Cheshire.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The ability to perform patient-specific simulated rehearsal of complex endovascular interventions is a technological advance with potential benefits to patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether patient-specific rehearsal of a carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure has an influence on tool selection and the use of fluoroscopy.
METHODS: Following case note and computed tomography (CT) angiographic review of a real patient case, subjects performed the CAS procedure on a virtual reality simulator. Endovascular tool requirements and fluoroscopic angles were evaluated with a pre- and post-case questionnaire. Participants also rated the simulation from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).
RESULTS: Thirty-three endovascular physicians with varying degrees of CAS experience were recruited: inexperienced (5-20 CAS procedures) n = 11, moderately (21-50 CAS procedures) n = 7 or highly experienced (>50 CAS procedures) n = 15. For all participants, 96 of a possible 363 changes (26%) were observed from pre- to post-case questionnaires. This was most notable for optimal fluoroscopy C-arm position 15/33 (46%), choice of selective catheter 13/33 (39%), choice of sheath or guiding catheter 11/33 (33%) and balloon dilatation strategy 10/33 (30%). Experience with the CAS procedure did not influence the degree of change significantly (p > 0.05), and all groups exhibited a considerable modification in tool and fluoroscopy preference. The model was considered realistic and useful as a tool to practice a real case (median score 4/5).
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific simulated rehearsal of a complex endovascular procedure strongly influences tool selection and fluoroscopy preferences for the real case. Further research has to evaluate how this technology may transfer from in vitro to in vivo and if it can reduce the radiation dose and the number of endovascular tools used and improve outcomes for patients in the clinical setting.
Copyright © 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21276738     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  8 in total

1.  Carotid vasculature modeling from patient CT angiography studies for interventional procedures simulation.

Authors:  M Freiman; L Joskowicz; N Broide; M Natanzon; E Nammer; O Shilon; L Weizman; J Sosna
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  The surgical ensemble: choreography as a simulation and training tool.

Authors:  Richard M Satava; Anne Marie Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Sonja N Buzink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Carotid Artery Stenting - Strategies to Improve Procedural Performance and Reduce the Learning Curve.

Authors:  Willem Im Willaert; Isabelle Van Herzeele
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-03

Review 5.  Unintended and Accidental Exposures, Significant Dose Events and Trigger Levels in Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Werner Jaschke; Gabriel Bartal; Colin J Martin; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Artificial vascular models for endovascular training (3D printing).

Authors:  Inez Torres; Nelson De Luccia
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2018-08-11

7.  Training in Interventional Radiology: A Simulation-Based Approach.

Authors:  Indrajeet Mandal; Utkarsh Ojha
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2020-04-13

8.  Effects of Advanced Cardiac Procedure Simulator Training on Learning and Performance in Cardiovascular Medicine Fellows.

Authors:  Michael N Young; Roshanak Markley; Troy Leo; Samuel Coffin; Mario A Davidson; Joseph Salloum; Lisa A Mendes; Julie B Damp
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2018-10-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.