Literature DB >> 21275533

Feedback data sources that inform physician self-assessment.

Jocelyn Lockyer1, Heather Armson, Benjamin Chesluk, Timothy Dornan, Eric Holmboe, Elaine Loney, Karen Mann, Joan Sargeant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-assessment is a process of interpreting data about one's performance and comparing it to explicit or implicit standards. AIM: To examine the external data sources physicians used to monitor themselves.
METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with physicians who participated in three practice improvement activities: a multisource feedback program; a program providing patient and chart audit data; and practice-based learning groups. We used grounded theory strategies to understand the external sources that stimulated self-assessment and how they worked.
RESULTS: Data from seven focus groups (49 physicians) were analyzed. Physicians used information from structured programs, other educational activities, professional colleagues, and patients. Data were of varying quality, often from non-formal sources with implicit (not explicit) standards. Mandatory programs elicited variable responses, whereas data and activities the physicians selected themselves were more likely to be accepted. Physicians used the information to create a reference point against which they could weigh their performance using it variably depending on their personal interpretation of its accuracy, application, and utility.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians use and interpret data and standards of varying quality to inform self-assessment. Physicians may benefit from regular and routine feedback and guidance on how to seek out data for self-assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21275533     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.542519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  10 in total

1.  An audit and feedback system for effective quality improvement in head and neck surgery: Can we become better surgeons?

Authors:  Carol M Lewis; Marcus M Monroe; Dianna B Roberts; Amy C Hessel; Stephen Y Lai; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Diagnostic image quality in gynaecological ultrasound: Who should measure it, what should we measure and how?

Authors:  Peter Cantin; Karen Knapp
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-28

3.  Guidelines: The do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Rose Hatala; Karen E Hauer; Eric Holmboe
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-10

4.  Clinical educator self-efficacy, self-evaluation and its relationship with student evaluations of clinical teaching.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Ratings of performance in multisource feedback: comparing performance theories of residents and nurses.

Authors:  Muhammad Tariq; Marjan Govaerts; Azam Afzal; Syed Ahsan Ali; Tabassum Zehra
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Smartphone and web-based independent consultation and feedback for joint replacement surgeries: a randomized control trial protocol.

Authors:  Guixian Tong; Qingqing Geng; Tong Xu; Debin Wang; Tongzhu Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  An exploration into physician and surgeon data sensemaking: a qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Emma Whitelock-Wainwright; Jia Wei Koh; Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright; Stella Talic; David Rankin; Dragan Gašević
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Video-based feedback of oral clinical presentations reduces the anxiety of ICU medical students: a multicentre, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Yonathan Freund; Mickael Alves; Antoine Monsel; Vincent Labbe; Elsa Darnal; Jonathan Messika; Jerome Bokobza; Thomas Similowski; Alexandre Duguet
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor-patient communication.

Authors:  Carolin Sehlbach; Pim W Teunissen; Erik W Driessen; Sharon Mitchell; Gernot G U Rohde; Frank W J M Smeenk; Marjan J B Govaerts
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Role of Technology in Self-Assessment and Feedback Among Hospitalist Physicians: Semistructured Interviews and Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Lukas Yin; Pargol Gheissari; Inna Wanyin Lin; Michael Sobolev; John P Pollak; Curtis Cole; Deborah Estrin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.