PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the most reproducible approach for left-atrial size assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation and its value for prediction of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) treatment success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients underwent CMR imaging prior to PVI; the CMR examination included standard cine sequences, a multislice cine sequence in 4-chamber orientation with full left-atrial coverage, and a contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the left atrium. Left-atrial size was determined as: diameter, area, volume segmented from angiography, and diastolic/systolic volumes from cine imaging (Simpson's rule). All measurements were carried out by two independent observers and repeated by one observer to assess inter- and intrareader variability. Treatment success was defined as persisting sinus rhythm after PVI (follow-up period 12.6 ± 6.6 months). RESULTS: All left-atrial measurements showed substantial intrareader agreement. Interreader agreement was substantial for diastolic/systolic left-atrial volumes only. Calculated bias was found to be minimal (0.1%-4.9%). Predictability of PVI treatment success was best using cine volumetric measurements (cutoff value for diastolic volume, 112 mL) yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Left-atrial volumetry based on cine imaging represented the most reproducible approach to determine left-atrial size. PVI success was predicted best using cine volumetry.
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the most reproducible approach for left-atrial size assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation and its value for prediction of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) treatment success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients underwent CMR imaging prior to PVI; the CMR examination included standard cine sequences, a multislice cine sequence in 4-chamber orientation with full left-atrial coverage, and a contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the left atrium. Left-atrial size was determined as: diameter, area, volume segmented from angiography, and diastolic/systolic volumes from cine imaging (Simpson's rule). All measurements were carried out by two independent observers and repeated by one observer to assess inter- and intrareader variability. Treatment success was defined as persisting sinus rhythm after PVI (follow-up period 12.6 ± 6.6 months). RESULTS: All left-atrial measurements showed substantial intrareader agreement. Interreader agreement was substantial for diastolic/systolic left-atrial volumes only. Calculated bias was found to be minimal (0.1%-4.9%). Predictability of PVI treatment success was best using cine volumetric measurements (cutoff value for diastolic volume, 112 mL) yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Left-atrial volumetry based on cine imaging represented the most reproducible approach to determine left-atrial size. PVI success was predicted best using cine volumetry.
Authors: Laura Kristin Wandelt; Johannes Tammo Kowallick; Andreas Schuster; Rolf Wachter; Thomas Stümpfig; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Michael Steinmetz; Christian Oliver Ritter; Joachim Lotz; Wieland Staab Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jan M Sohns; Christina Rosenberg; Antonia Zapf; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Wieland Staab; Andreas Schuster; Johannes T Kowallick; Olga Hösch; Thuy-Trang Nguyen; Martin Fasshauer; Thomas Paul; Joachim Lotz; Michael Steinmetz Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Petr Kuchynka; Jana Podzimkova; Martin Masek; Lukas Lambert; Vladimir Cerny; Barbara Danek; Tomas Palecek Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Nicoline W E van den Berg; Dean R P P Chan Pin Yin; Wouter R Berger; Jolien Neefs; Rianne H A C M De Bruin-Bon; Henk A Marquering; Annelie Slaar; R Nils Planken; Joris R de Groot Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Timm Seewöster; Petra Büttner; Sotirios Nedios; Philipp Sommer; Nikolaos Dagres; Katja Schumacher; Andreas Bollmann; Sebastian Hilbert; Cosima Jahnke; Ingo Paetsch; Gerhard Hindricks; Jelena Kornej Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.501