Literature DB >> 21274667

Chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer: is there a global standard?

Hyunseok Kang1, John S Kauh.   

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide even though its incidence has been decreasing in recent years. Despite remarkable advancements in chemotherapy, advanced gastric cancer has remained a therapeutic challenge for physicians as well as for patients. While early chemotherapeutic regimens succeeded in showing a modest but definite improvement over best supportive care, no single regimen stood out as superior. Most early trials failed to show survival benefit of combination regimens over single agent fluorouracil, but combination regimens were shown to have better response rates. Based on these data, the Japanese adopted single agent fluorouracil as a reference standard for further investigations, while the rest of the world used a doublet containing fluorouracil and platinum. As more clinical trials were conducted, the Japanese standard evolved into a doublet, while the Western countries adopted triplet combinations. There is no established global standard as yet, but with the introduction of newer targeted agents based on molecular assays and personalized approaches combined with conventional chemotherapy, multiple regimens are likely to emerge as global standards rather than one standard treatment for all.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21274667     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-010-0135-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  39 in total

1.  Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for advanced esophagogastric cancer: dose-finding study for the prospective multicenter, randomized, phase II/III REAL-3 trial.

Authors:  Alicia F C Okines; Sue E Ashley; David Cunningham; Jacqueline Oates; Andrea Turner; Janine Webb; Claire Saffery; Yu Jo Chua; Ian Chau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data.

Authors:  Anna D Wagner; Wilfried Grothe; Johannes Haerting; Gerhard Kleber; Axel Grothey; Wolfgang E Fleig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial.

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; Wuilbert Rodriguez; Gyorgy Bodoky; Vladimir Moiseyenko; Mikhail Lichinitser; Vera Gorbunova; Ihor Vynnychenko; August Garin; Istvan Lang; Silvia Falcon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Esophagogastric cancer: targeted agents.

Authors:  Geoffrey Y Ku; David H Ilson
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Vladimir M Moiseyenko; Sergei Tjulandin; Alejandro Majlis; Manuel Constenla; Corrado Boni; Adriano Rodrigues; Miguel Fodor; Yee Chao; Edouard Voznyi; Marie-Laure Risse; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  FAMTX versus etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin: a random assignment trial in gastric cancer.

Authors:  D Kelsen; O T Atiq; L Saltz; D Niedzwiecki; D Ginn; D Chapman; R Heelan; C Lightdale; V Vinciguerra; M Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Systemic treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Alessandro Morabito; Guido Carillio; Raffaele Longo
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; Sheela Rao; Timothy Iveson; Marianne Nicolson; Fareeda Coxon; Gary Middleton; Francis Daniel; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Richard Norman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M Dank; J Zaluski; C Barone; V Valvere; S Yalcin; C Peschel; M Wenczl; E Goker; L Cisar; K Wang; R Bugat
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  The role of S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Kubota
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  16 in total

1.  Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial.

Authors:  Taroh Satoh; Yung-Jue Bang; Evgeny A Gotovkin; Yasuo Hamamoto; Yoon-Koo Kang; Vladimir M Moiseyenko; Atsushi Ohtsu; Eric Van Cutsem; Nedal Al-Sakaff; Alexa Urspruch; Julie Hill; Harald A Weber; Hyun-Cheol Chung
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-06-20

Review 2.  Metastatic gastric cancer treatment: a little slow but worthy progress.

Authors:  Ozkan Kanat; Bert H O'Neil
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Level of hospital care and outcome of gastric cancer: a population-based evaluation of the Munich Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Anne Schlesinger-Raab; André L Mihaljevic; Silvia Egert; Rebecca T Emeny; Karl-Walter Jauch; Jörg Kleeff; Alexander Novotny; Natascha C Nüssler; Miriam Rottmann; Wolfgang Schepp; Wolfgang Schmitt; Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle; Bernhard Weber; Christoph Schuhmacher; Jutta Engel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Assessment of HER2 status in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with epirubicin-based chemotherapy: heterogeneity-related issues and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Nicola Personeni; Marina Baretti; Silvia Bozzarelli; Paola Spaggiari; Luca Rubino; Maria Chiara Tronconi; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Riccardo Rosati; Laura Giordano; Massimo Roncalli; Armando Santoro; Lorenza Rimassa
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Prognostic significance of c-erbB2 overexpression in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Authors:  Muharrem Bayrak; Omer Fatih Olmez; Ender Kurt; Erdem Cubukcu; Turkkan Evrensel; Ozkan Kanat; Osman Manavoglu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Personalized medicine for targeted and platinum-based chemotherapy of lung and bladder cancer.

Authors:  George D Cimino; Chong-xian Pan; Paul T Henderson
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Drug repositioning for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Li; Steven Jm Jones
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  FGFR2 amplification has prognostic significance in gastric cancer: results from a large international multicentre study.

Authors:  X Su; P Zhan; P R Gavine; S Morgan; C Womack; X Ni; D Shen; Y-J Bang; S-A Im; W Ho Kim; E-J Jung; H I Grabsch; E Kilgour
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Quantitative measurement of organic acids in tissues from gastric cancer patients indicates increased glucose metabolism in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; Man Jeong Paik; Yi Xuan; Duc-Toan Nguyen; In-Hye Ham; Jisoo Yun; Yong Kwan Cho; Gwang Lee; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Outcomes of third-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer who failed previous oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based chemotherapies.

Authors:  Min Jeong Lee; In Gyu Hwang; Joung-Soon Jang; Jin Hwa Choi; Byeong-Bae Park; Myung Hee Chang; Seung Tae Kim; Se Hoon Park; Myoung Hee Kang; Jung Hun Kang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.