Literature DB >> 21274548

Relation between alignments of upper and subaxial cervical spine: a radiological study.

Qunfeng Guo1, Bin Ni, Jian Yang, Kai Liu, Zhichao Sun, Fengjin Zhou, Jianxin Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the relation between alignments of upper and subaxial cervical spine and deduce the optimal atlantoaxial fusion angle by a radiological study.
METHODS: 414 asymptomatic volunteers (213 males, 201 females) underwent cervical lateral radiographs in neutral position. The Oc-C2 angle, C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle were measured. Relations among these three angles and relations between angles and age were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean Oc-C2 angle was 16.3° ± 7.0° in females, significantly larger than 14.9° ± 6.5° in males. The mean C1-C2 angles were 28.2° ± 4.0° in females and 26.4° ± 4.6° in males, and C2-C7 angles were 12.7° ± 6.6° and 16.3° ± 7.3°, correspondingly. The mean C1-C2 angle in females was significantly larger than that in males, while C2-C7 angle smaller than that in males. The C2-C7 angle correlated significantly not only with C1-C2 angle but also with Oc-C2 angle. And correlation between C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle was stronger than that between Oc-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle. There were also significant positive correlations between C1-C2 and Oc-C2 angles. Oc-C2 angle, C1-C2 angle, and C2-C7 angle correlated significantly with age in both sexes.
CONCLUSIONS: There were negative correlations between C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle as well as between Oc-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle, and the former correlation was stronger. C1-C2 fixation angle was the key to regulate postoperative subaxial alignment in atlantoaxial arthrodesis. The optimal atlantoaxial fusion angle may be between 25° and 30°.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21274548     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1265-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  24 in total

1.  Prospective multi-centric evaluation of upper cervical and infra-cervical sagittal compensatory alignment in patients with adult cervical deformity.

Authors:  Subaraman Ramchandran; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Daniel Sciubba; Justin K Scheer; Cyrus M Jalai; Alan Daniels; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage; Han Jo Kim; Gregory Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Robert A Hart; Justin S Smith; Christopher Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Modified technique for C1-2 screw-rod fixation and fusion using autogenous bicortical iliac crest graft.

Authors:  Bin Ni; Fengjin Zhou; Qunfeng Guo; Songkai Li; Xiang Guo; Ning Xie
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Severe dysphagia after a posterior cervical spine fusion at the C1-C3 level and its improvement after correction surgery for malalignment: a case report.

Authors:  Siravich Suvithayasiri; Payothorn Decharin
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  Cervical deformity patients with baseline hyperlordosis or hyperkyphosis differ in surgical treatment and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Haddy Alas; Nicholas Kummer; Peter Tretiakov; Bassel G Diebo; Renaud Lafage; Christopher P Ames; Breton Line; Eric O Klineberg; Douglas C Burton; Juan S Uribe; Han Jo Kim; Alan H Daniels; Shay Bess; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank J Schwab; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

6.  Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to gender, pelvic incidence and age.

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Solène Prost; Sébastien Pesenti; Brice Ilharreborde; Eloïse Bauduin; Féthi Laouissat; Guillaume Riouallon; Stéphane Wolff; Vincent Challier; Ibrahim Obeid; Louis Boissière; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Federico Solla; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Stéphane Bourret; Joe Faddoul; Georges Naïm Abi Lahoud; Vincent Fière; Michiel Vande Kerckhove; Matthieu Campana; Jonathan Lebhar; Hadrien Giorgi; Aymeric Faure; Erik André Sauleau; Benjamin Blondel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanical comparison of a novel transoral atlantoaxial anchored cage with established fixation technique - a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Bao-cheng Zhang; Hai-bo Liu; Xian-hua Cai; Zhi-hua Wang; Feng Xu; Hui Kang; Ran Ding; Xiao-qing Luo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Postoperative Increase in Occiput-C2 Angle Negatively Impacts Subaxial Lordosis after Occipito-Upper Cervical Posterior Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Taigo Inada; Takeo Furuya; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Satoshi Maki; Takane Suzuki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Masaaki Aramomi; Chikato Mannoji; Masao Koda
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

10.  Comparison of Cervical Alignment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Os Odontoideum versus Non-Os Odontoideum after Atlantoaxial Fixation.

Authors:  Farid Yudoyono; Jiin Kang; Yoon Ha
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.