Literature DB >> 21274242

Can fundal height predict birth weight or twins?

J L Reynolds, A Kettner, M Burnett, M Cheang.   

Abstract

To determine how well symphysis fundal height measurements correlated with birth weight, the authors retrospectively reviewed 100 records of pregnancy from a family practice. The sensitivity and specificity of symphysis fundal height in identifying small and large for gestational age babies were determined. While symphysis fundal height measurements correlated well with birth weight, the sensitivity was too low and the number of false positives too high, for symphysis fundal height measurement alone to be clinically useful. On reviewing all twin pregnancies in the same setting, the authors found that symphysis fundal height measurements facilitated early diagnosis of twin gestation.

Year:  1986        PMID: 21274242      PMCID: PMC2327595     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  18 in total

1.  Placental insufficiency and the small undernourished full-term infant.

Authors:  W L RUMBOLZ; L S MCGOOGAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1953-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The assessment of fetal development by diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  S Campbell
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Fallacy of the fundal height.

Authors:  J M Beazley; R A Underhill
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-11-14

4.  Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  R Usher; F McLean
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Evaluation of antepartum fetal well-being by measuring growth.

Authors:  P J Tropper; H E Fox
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Antepartum determination of fetal health: composite biophysical profile scoring.

Authors:  F A Manning; I Morrison; I R Lange; C Harman
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.430

7.  The nonstress test: a review of 3,000 tests.

Authors:  J P Phelan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Prediction of small-for-dates infants by measurement of symphysial-fundal-height.

Authors:  P Quaranta; R Currell; C W Redman; J S Robinson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1981-02

9.  Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal wellbeing.

Authors:  S Neldam
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  L A Norman
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.292

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.