Literature DB >> 21273525

Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation in patients with a single lung: feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance.

Agathe Hess1, Jean Palussière, Jean-François Goyers, Axel Guth, Anne Aupérin, Thierry de Baère.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance of pulmonary radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of lung tumors in patients with a single lung.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study from four institutions, with waiver of institutional review board approval and of informed consent. From July 2003 to March 2009, 15 single-lung patients (nine men and six women; mean age, 64 years; age range, 42-82 years) with one to three lung tumors underwent 16 sessions of RF ablation. One patient underwent two sessions due to occurrence of new tumors. Eleven patients had primary lung cancer and four patients had metastases. The previous pneumonectomy was performed for the treatment of primary or secondary lung tumors. Twenty-one tumors measuring 4-37 mm (mean, 15.5 mm ± 8 [standard deviation]) were treated. All procedures were performed by using general anesthesia with intubation. Electrodes were expandable in 13 procedures and straight in three. The efficacy was evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, performed 3, 6, 12, and 18 months and 2 years after treatment. The median follow-up was 17.6 months, with seven patients being followed at 1 year and three being followed at 2 years. Treatment tolerance was evaluated from results of clinical examination, follow-up CT, and CT performed immediately after completion of RF ablation.
RESULTS: No procedural deaths occurred. Procedural complications observed at CT during RF ablation were mild parenchymal hemorrhages (n = 5; 31%). All pneumothoraces (n = 6; 37%) resolved after chest tube placement. Postprocedural complications included one case of pulmonary infection and two cases of limited hemoptysis. Complete tumor ablation was obtained in all RF sessions but one (15 of 16; 95%). Overall survival rate was 71.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36%, 92%) at 2 years; cancer-specific survival was 100% at 2 years. The tumor-free survival was 58.7% (95% CI: 32%, 81%) at 1 year and 19.6% (95% CI: 4%, 58%) at 2 years.
CONCLUSION: RF ablation appears to be a reasonable and safe option in patients with a single lung. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21273525     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

Review 1.  The role of percutaneous image-guided ablation for lung tumors.

Authors:  Elena N Petre; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Microwave Ablation in the Management of Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastases.

Authors:  I Kurilova; A Gonzalez-Aguirre; R G Beets-Tan; J Erinjeri; E N Petre; M Gonen; M Bains; N E Kemeny; S B Solomon; C T Sofocleous
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy for a new lung cancer arising after pneumonectomy: dosimetric evaluation and pulmonary toxicity.

Authors:  Alessandro Testolin; Maria Silvia Favretto; Stefania Cora; Carlo Cavedon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus percutaneous local tumor ablation for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bryan J Ager; Stacey M Wells; Joshua D Gruhl; Gregory J Stoddard; Randa Tao; Kristine E Kokeny; Ying J Hitchcock
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 5.  Lung cancer ablation: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Thierry de Baere; Geoffroy Farouil; Frederic Deschamps
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Microsimulation model predicts survival benefit of radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy versus radiotherapy for treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Angela C Tramontano; Lauren E Cipriano; Chung Yin Kong; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Michael Lanuti; G Scott Gazelle; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  RFA of primary and metastatic lung tumors: long-term results.

Authors:  Stefano Giusto Picchi; Giulia Lassandro; Andrea Bianco; Andrea Coppola; Anna Maria Ierardi; Umberto G Rossi; Francesco Lassandro
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Is There a Role for Percutaneous Ablation for Early Stage Lung Cancer? What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  J Palussière; M Cazayus; S Cousin; M Cabart; F Chomy; V Catena; X Buy
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Multicenter Study of Metastatic Lung Tumors Targeted by Interventional Cryoablation Evaluation (SOLSTICE).

Authors:  Matthew R Callstrom; David A Woodrum; Francis C Nichols; Jean Palussiere; Xavier Buy; Robert D Suh; Fereidoun G Abtin; Bradley B Pua; David C Madoff; Sandeep L Bagla; Dimitrios C Papadouris; Hiran C Fernando; Damian E Dupuy; Terrance T Healey; William H Moore; Thomas V Bilfinger; Stephen B Solomon; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Henry J Krebs; Charles J Fulp; Antoine Hakime; Lambros Tselikas; Thierry de Baere
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 20.121

10.  Ki 67 is an independent predictive biomarker of cancer specific and local recurrence-free survival after lung tumor ablation.

Authors:  Constantinos T Sofocleous; Sandeep K Garg; Perry Cohen; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Joseph P Erinjeri; Robert J Downey; William D Travis; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.339

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.