Literature DB >> 21273520

Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain.

Maria Sala1, Dolores Salas, Francesc Belvis, Mar Sánchez, Joana Ferrer, Josefa Ibañez, Rubén Román, Francisco Ferrer, Alfonso Vega, Maria Soledad Laso, Xavier Castells.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the introduction of digital mammography on the recall rate, detection rate, false-positive rate, and rates of invasive procedures in a cohort of women from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee; informed consent was not required. A total of 242,838 mammograms (171,191 screen film [screen-film mammography group] and 71,647 digital [digital mammography group]) obtained in 103,613 women aged 45-69 years were included. False-positive results for any additional procedure and for invasive procedures, the breast cancer rate, and the positive predictive value in each group were compared by using Pearson χ(2) test. The effect of the mammographic technology used (screen-film or digital) on the false-positive results and cancer detection risk was evaluated with multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted according to women's and the screening program's characteristics and time trends.
RESULTS: The false-positive rate was higher for screen-film than for digital mammography (7.6% and 5.7%, respectively; P < .001). False-positive results after an invasive procedure were significantly higher for screen-film than for digital mammography (1.9% and 0.7%, respectively; P < .001). No significant differences were observed in the overall cancer detection rate between the two groups (0.45% and 0.43% in the screen-film and digital mammography groups, respectively; P = .59). The adjusted risk of a false-positive result was higher for screen-film than for digital mammography (odds ratio = 1.32). The adjusted risk was also lower for the digital mammography group when time trends were taken into account.
CONCLUSION: The lower false-positive risk with use of digital mammography should be taken into account when balancing the risks and benefits of breast cancer screening. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21273520     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain.

Authors:  Laia Domingo; Anabel Romero; Francesc Belvis; Mar Sánchez; Joana Ferrer; Dolores Salas; Josefa Ibáñez; Alfonso Vega; Francesc Ferrer; M Soledad Laso; Francesc Macià; Xavier Castells; Maria Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Digital Mammography in Young Women: Is a Single View Sufficient?

Authors:  Johannes Gossner
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

Review 3.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Effects of digital mammography uptake on downstream breast-related care among older women.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Weiwei Zhu; Tracy L Onega; Paul Fishman; Louise M Henderson; Anna N A Tosteson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Does digital mammography suppose an advance in early diagnosis? Trends in performance indicators 6 years after digitalization.

Authors:  Maria Sala; Laia Domingo; Francesc Macià; Mercè Comas; Andrea Burón; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Risk of breast cancer after false-positive results in mammographic screening.

Authors:  Marta Román; Xavier Castells; Solveig Hofvind; My von Euler-Chelpin
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Validation of DM-Scan, a computer-assisted tool to assess mammographic density in full-field digital mammograms.

Authors:  Marina Pollán; Rafael Llobet; Josefa Miranda-García; Joaquín Antón; María Casals; Inmaculada Martínez; Carmen Palop; Francisco Ruiz-Perales; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Vidal; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Dolores Salas-Trejo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-05-24

8.  Budget impact analysis of switching to digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: a discrete event simulation model.

Authors:  Mercè Comas; Arantzazu Arrospide; Javier Mar; Maria Sala; Ester Vilaprinyó; Cristina Hernández; Francesc Cots; Juan Martínez; Xavier Castells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Long-Term Risk of Breast Cancer after Diagnosis of Benign Breast Disease by Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Marta Román; Javier Louro; Margarita Posso; Carmen Vidal; Xavier Bargalló; Ivonne Vázquez; María Jesús Quintana; Rodrigo Alcántara; Francina Saladié; Javier Del Riego; Lupe Peñalva; Maria Sala; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.