OBJECTIVES: To explore social inequalities in residential exposure to road traffic noise in an urban area. METHODS: Environmental injustice in road traffic noise exposure was investigated in Paris, France, using the RECORD Cohort Study (n = 2130) and modelled noise data. Associations were assessed by estimating noise exposure within the local area around participants' residence, considering various socioeconomic variables defined at both individual and neighbourhood level, and comparing different regression models attempting or not to control for spatial autocorrelation in noise levels. RESULTS: After individual-level adjustment, participants' noise exposure increased with neighbourhood educational level and dwelling value but also with proportion of non-French citizens, suggesting seemingly contradictory findings. However, when country of citizenship was defined according to its human development level, noise exposure in fact increased and decreased with the proportions of citizens from advantaged and disadvantaged countries, respectively. These findings were consistent with those reported for the other socioeconomic characteristics, suggesting higher road traffic noise exposure in advantaged neighbourhoods. Substantial collinearity between neighbourhood explanatory variables and spatial random effects caused identifiability problems that prevented successful control for spatial autocorrelation. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous literature, this study shows that people living in advantaged neighbourhoods were more exposed to road traffic noise in their residential environment than their deprived counterparts. This case study demonstrates the need to systematically perform sensitivity analyses with multiple socioeconomic characteristics to avoid incorrect inferences about an environmental injustice situation and the complexity of effectively controlling for spatial autocorrelation when fixed and random components of the model are correlated.
OBJECTIVES: To explore social inequalities in residential exposure to road traffic noise in an urban area. METHODS: Environmental injustice in road traffic noise exposure was investigated in Paris, France, using the RECORD Cohort Study (n = 2130) and modelled noise data. Associations were assessed by estimating noise exposure within the local area around participants' residence, considering various socioeconomic variables defined at both individual and neighbourhood level, and comparing different regression models attempting or not to control for spatial autocorrelation in noise levels. RESULTS: After individual-level adjustment, participants' noise exposure increased with neighbourhood educational level and dwelling value but also with proportion of non-French citizens, suggesting seemingly contradictory findings. However, when country of citizenship was defined according to its human development level, noise exposure in fact increased and decreased with the proportions of citizens from advantaged and disadvantaged countries, respectively. These findings were consistent with those reported for the other socioeconomic characteristics, suggesting higher road traffic noise exposure in advantaged neighbourhoods. Substantial collinearity between neighbourhood explanatory variables and spatial random effects caused identifiability problems that prevented successful control for spatial autocorrelation. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous literature, this study shows that people living in advantaged neighbourhoods were more exposed to road traffic noise in their residential environment than their deprived counterparts. This case study demonstrates the need to systematically perform sensitivity analyses with multiple socioeconomic characteristics to avoid incorrect inferences about an environmental injustice situation and the complexity of effectively controlling for spatial autocorrelation when fixed and random components of the model are correlated.
Authors: Jaana I Halonen; Jussi Vahtera; Stephen Stansfeld; Tarja Yli-Tuomi; Paula Salo; Jaana Pentti; Mika Kivimäki; Timo Lanki Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Laura M Dale; Sophie Goudreau; Stephane Perron; Martina S Ragettli; Marianne Hatzopoulou; Audrey Smargiassi Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Matthias Braubach; Myriam Tobollik; Pierpaolo Mudu; Rosemary Hiscock; Dimitris Chapizanis; Denis A Sarigiannis; Menno Keuken; Laura Perez; Marco Martuzzi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Erica A Hinckson; Scott Duncan; Melody Oliver; Suzanne Mavoa; Ester Cerin; Hannah Badland; Tom Stewart; Vivienne Ivory; Julia McPhee; Grant Schofield Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 2.692