Literature DB >> 21272732

Near-normal gait pattern with peroneal electrical stimulation as a neuroprosthesis in the chronic phase of stroke: a case report.

Roos van Swigchem1, Vivian Weerdesteyn, Hanneke J van Duijnhoven, Jasper den Boer, Tjemme Beems, Alexander C Geurts.   

Abstract

In recent years, the use of functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the peroneal nerve has increased as an alternative for an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) to treat stroke-related drop foot. We present a chronic stroke patient demonstrating an almost normal gait pattern with peroneal FES as a neuroprosthesis. A 60-year-old survivor of a right hemisphere infarction 21 months ago, who regularly used a polypropylene AFO, was provided with a surface-based peroneal FES device for severe drop foot. In a second instance, he received an implanted FES system because of skin problems with the surface stimulator. With both FES devices, the patient achieved an adequate foot elevation. Moreover, his hip and knee flexion angles during walking increased to normal values and his ankle push-off power increased. His gait pattern became almost symmetrical and less variable than with the AFO. Furthermore, his ability to avoid a sudden obstacle improved to normal values with FES. Our patient showed benefits from peroneal FES beyond what can be attributed to improved foot lift alone. With regard to the potential working mechanisms underlying this response to FES, biomechanical benefits related to improved ankle push-off are suggested as the main mechanism.
Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21272732     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  7 in total

1.  Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait recovery post-neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chad I Lairamore; Mark K Garrison; Laetitia Bourgeon; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2014-08-25

2.  Spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic effects of a peroneal nerve stimulator versus an ankle foot orthosis in hemiparetic gait.

Authors:  Lynne R Sheffler; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Richard D Wilson; John Chae
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Automatic identification of gait events using an instrumented sock.

Authors:  Stephen J Preece; Laurence P J Kenney; Matthew J Major; Tilak Dias; Edward Lay; Bosco T Fernandes
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  The long-term effects of an implantable drop foot stimulator on gait in hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  Agnes Sturma; Othmar Schuhfried; Timothy Hasenoehrl; Clemens Ambrozy; Stefan Salminger; Laura A Hruby; Johannes A Mayer; Kirsten Götz-Neumann; Richard Crevenna; Michaela M Pinter; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of dorsiflexor functional electrical stimulation compared to an ankle/foot orthosis on stroke-related genu recurvatum gait.

Authors:  Dong-Yun Bae; Jong-Hwa Shin; Ju-Seung Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2019-11-26

6.  Implanted Peroneal Nerve Stimulator Treatment for Drop Foot Caused by Central Nervous System Lesion: A Twelve-Month Follow-up of 21 Patients.

Authors:  Kaare Severinsen; Kurt Grey; Anne Haase Juhl; Preben Soerensen; Lorenz Oppel; Ib Magnussen; Birgit Tine Larsen
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Predictive simulation of post-stroke gait with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Gilmar F Santos; Eike Jakubowitz; Nicolas Pronost; Thomas Bonis; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.