Literature DB >> 21272717

Measuring upper limb capacity in poststroke patients: development, fit of the monotone homogeneity model, unidimensionality, fit of the double monotonicity model, differential item functioning, internal consistency, and feasibility of the stroke upper limb capacity scale, SULCS.

Leo D Roorda1, Annemieke Houwink, Wendy Smits, Ivo W Molenaar, Alexander C Geurts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop an easy-to-use scale that measures upper limb capacity, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health definition, in patients after stroke, and to investigate certain psychometric properties of this scale.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Inpatient department of a rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=546; mean age ± SD, 60.1±11.2y; 56% men) undergoing rehabilitation after stroke.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mokken scale analysis was used to investigate the following psychometric properties: (1) fit of the monotone homogeneity model, indicating that the items form a scale; (2) unidimensionality, indicating that the items measure only 1 concept (or construct); (3) fit of the double monotonicity model, indicating invariant (hierarchical) item ordering; (4) differential item functioning (DIF), indicating the validity of comparison between subgroups; and (5) internal consistency, indicating the degree of interrelatedness of the items. The mean time needed to complete the scale was calculated to indicate (6) feasibility.
RESULTS: The Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) was developed on the basis of interviews with experts. Ten of 15 items had (1) good fit of the monotone homogeneity model (coefficient H=.88), were (2) unidimensional, and had (3) good fit of the double monotonicity model (coefficient H(T)=.71), (4) absence of DIF (Crit-values <40), and (5) good internal consistency (coefficient ρ=.96). When applying start-and-stop rules, the (6) feasibility of the SULCS was good (6min).
CONCLUSIONS: The SULCS is an easy-to-use, unidimensional, hierarchical, and internally consistent scale that assesses upper limb capacity in patients after stroke.
Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21272717     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  12 in total

1.  Providing unloading by exoskeleton improves shoulder flexion performance after stroke.

Authors:  Bonnie Perry; Jenn Sivak; Dobrivoje Stokic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Convergent Validity and Responsiveness of the SULCS.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; Amy S Friedl; Kristine M Hansen; Terri Z Hisel; Mary Y Harley
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Evaluation of Performance-Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sophie Wang; C Janice Hsu; Lauren Trent; Tiffany Ryan; Nathan T Kearns; Eugene F Civillico; Kimberly L Kontson
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  The effects of very early mirror therapy on functional improvement of the upper extremity in acute stroke patients.

Authors:  Ipek Yeldan; Burcu Ersoz Huseyınsınoglu; Buket Akıncı; Ela Tarakcı; Sevim Baybas; Arzu Razak Ozdıncler
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-11-30

5.  Assessing upper limb function: transcultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale.

Authors:  João Paulo Branco; Sandra Oliveira; João Páscoa Pinheiro; Pedro L Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-03

6.  Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nele De Bruyn; Bea Essers; Liselot Thijs; Annick Van Gils; Lisa Tedesco Triccas; Sarah Meyer; Kaat Alaerts; Geert Verheyden
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Movement Sonification in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz; Jeannine Bergmann; Alfred O Effenberg; Carmen Krewer; Tong-Hun Hwang; Friedemann Müller
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Arm-Hand Boost Therapy During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sarah Meyer; Geert Verheyden; Kristof Kempeneers; Marc Michielsen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Sensorimotor vs. Motor Upper Limb Therapy for Patients With Motor and Somatosensory Deficits: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Early Rehabilitation Phase After Stroke.

Authors:  Nele De Bruyn; Leen Saenen; Liselot Thijs; Annick Van Gils; Eva Ceulemans; Bea Essers; Christophe Lafosse; Marc Michielsen; Hilde Beyens; Fabienne Schillebeeckx; Kaat Alaerts; Geert Verheyden
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Brain connectivity alterations after additional sensorimotor or motor therapy for the upper limb in the early-phase post stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nele De Bruyn; Leen Saenen; Liselot Thijs; Annick Van Gils; Eva Ceulemans; Bea Essers; Kaat Alaerts; Geert Verheyden
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.