Literature DB >> 21272533

Pharmacists' acceptable levels of compensation for MTM services: a conjoint analysis.

Junling Wang1, Song Hee Hong, Songmei Meng, Lawrence M Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 requires prescription drug plans to provide medication therapy management (MTM) services to Medicare beneficiaries who are at high risk for inappropriate use of medications. However, inadequate compensation has been a barrier for MTM expansion among pharmacists.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine pharmacists' acceptable levels of compensation for MTM services.
METHODS: A preference-based fractional factorial design of conjoint analysis was used by surveying 1524 active pharmacists in Tennessee. Pharmacists were asked to select between packages (scenarios) of MTM services that represented combinations of MTM attributes (characteristics). The MTM attributes included type of patient (new or returning), patient's number of chronic conditions (1, 3, or 6), patient's number of medications (4, 8, or 16), patient's annual drug costs ($2000, $3000, or $4000), service duration (15 minutes, 30 minutes, or 45 minutes), and price of MTM services ($30, $60, or $120). A survival analysis model was used to predict pharmacists' willingness to select 1 versus another MTM service package. Pharmacists' acceptable level of compensation was estimated as the marginal rate of substitution between the parameter estimates of an attribute and the price attribute of MTM.
RESULTS: The parameter estimates were -0.0303 (P<.0001) for service duration and 0.0210 (P<.0001) for price of MTM services, respectively, so pharmacists were willing to accept $1.44/min (0.0303/0.0210), or $86.4/h, for MTM services. Pharmacists' characteristics were associated significantly with their acceptable levels of compensation: years of practice was associated with a higher need for compensation, pharmacy ownership (vs nonowner) associated with a lower need, and having provided MTM previously (vs having not provided MTM) was associated with a higher need.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists' acceptable level of compensation is in the higher part of current ranges from $30 to $100/h. To increase participation in MTM services, pharmacist compensation needs to be increased. Future studies might continue to corroborate the generalizability of findings from this study.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21272533     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  7 in total

Review 1.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

2.  Contingent valuation and pharmacists' acceptable levels of compensation for medication therapy management services.

Authors:  Junling Wang; Song Hee Hong
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2012-03-20

3.  Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about chronic noncancer pain in primary care: a Canadian survey of physicians and pharmacists.

Authors:  Lyne Lalonde; Vincent Leroux-Lapointe; Manon Choinière; Elisabeth Martin; David Lussier; Djamal Berbiche; Diane Lamarre; Robert Thiffault; Ghaya Jouini; Sylvie Perreault
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Physicians' and patients' valuation of pharmaceutical care implementation in Poznan (Poland) community pharmacies.

Authors:  Magdalena Waszyk-Nowaczyk; Piotr Nowaczyk; Marek Simon
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  "It Made a Difference to Me": A Comparative Case Study of Community Pharmacists' Care Planning Services in Primary Health Care.

Authors:  Theresa J Schindel; Rene R Breault; Christine A Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-11

6.  Positioning pharmacists' roles in primary health care: a discourse analysis of the compensation plan in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Christine A Hughes; Rene R Breault; Deborah Hicks; Theresa J Schindel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Attribute development and level selection for a discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of health care providers for capitation payment mechanism in Kenya.

Authors:  Melvin Obadha; Edwine Barasa; Jacob Kazungu; Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro; Jane Chuma
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2019-10-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.