Literature DB >> 21272529

Results of the Arizona Medicaid health information technology pharmacy focus groups.

Terri L Warholak1, Anita Murcko, Megan McKee, Terry Urbine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2007, a federal Medicaid Transformation Grant was awarded to design, develop, and deploy a statewide Health Information Exchange and Electronic Health Record in Arizona, United States.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the health information technology needs, knowledge, and expectations of Arizona's health care professionals, moderated focus groups were conducted. This article describes the results of the pharmacist focus groups.
METHODS: Focus group activities included a brief presentation, completion of a paper-based survey, and group discussion. The methods included solicitation by invitation, participant selection, meeting content, collaterals, focus group execution, recording, analysis, and discerning comparability among groups.
RESULTS: Pharmacy focus group discussions centered on electronic prescribing, including the anticipated advantages: reducing handwriting interpretation errors, improving formulary compliance, improving communication with prescribers, increasing efficiency, and ensuring data accuracy. Disadvantages included: medication errors, inadequate training and knowledge of software applications, and inflated patient expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists ranked e-prescribing as the highest priority feature of an electronic health system.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21272529     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  5 in total

1.  Crucial factors for the acceptance of a computerized national medication list: insights into findings from the evaluation of the Austrian e-Medikation pilot.

Authors:  W O Hackl; A Hoerbst; G Duftschmid; W Gall; S Janzek-Hawlat; M Jung; K Woertz; W Dorda; E Ammenwerth
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Reflections on the role of the pharmacy regulatory authority in enhancing quality related event reporting in community pharmacies.

Authors:  Todd A Boyle; Andrea C Bishop; Thomas Mahaffey; Neil J Mackinnon; Darren M Ashcroft; Bev Zwicker; Carolyn Reid
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2013-07-02

3.  Assessment of pharmacy information system performance in selected hospitals in isfahan city during 2011.

Authors:  Sakineh Saqaeian Nejad Isfahani; Razieh Mirzaeian; Mahbobe Habibi
Journal:  Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod       Date:  2013-02-13

4.  Evaluation of pharmacy information system in teaching, private and social services Hospitals in 2011.

Authors:  Sakineh Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani; Razieh Mirzaeian; Hasan Jannesari; Asghar Ehteshami; Awat Feizi; Ahmadreza Raeisi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-05-05

5.  Pharmacists' Perceptions of the Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicators.

Authors:  Laura V Minard; Heidi Deal; Megan E Harrison; Kent Toombs; Heather Neville; Andrea Meade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.