Literature DB >> 21271334

Mechanical strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implants.

Chau-Hsiang Wang1, Ju-Hui Wu2, Kun-Tsung Lee2, Kun-Rong Hsu2, Huang Chi Wang3, Chun-Ming Chen4.   

Abstract

Orthodontic anchorages have recently been reinforced by newly developed mini-implants. The aim of the present study was to investigate the mechanical strengths of infrazygomatic mini-implants. We measured the insertion torque and pull-out strength of three brands of infrazygomatic mini-implants (AbsoAnchors, Bioray, and Lomas). All three mini-implants were 2 mm in diameter, and five of each brand were manually driven 6 mm into artificial bone. Significant differences among the brands were investigated with Kruskal-Wallis tests. We found no significant relationship between insertion torque and pull-out strength in any individual brand. Among the three brands of infrazygomatic mini-implants, we found no significant difference in mechanical strength. The design of an infrazygomatic mini-implant may be the most important factor determining its mechanical strength.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21271334     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-010-0142-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  8 in total

1.  The spider screw for skeletal anchorage.

Authors:  B Giuliano Maino; John Bednar; Paolo Pagin; Paola Mura
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2003-02

2.  Compressive and shear properties of commercially available polyurethane foams.

Authors:  Mark S Thompson; Ian D McCarthy; Lars Lidgren; Leif Ryd
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient.

Authors:  Tae-Woo Kim; Hyewon Kim; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Stripping torque as a predictor of successful internal fracture fixation.

Authors:  Thomas R Edwards; Greg Tevelen; Hugh English; Ross Crawford
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  C-orthodontic microimplant for distalization of mandibular dentition in Class III correction.

Authors:  Kyurhim Chung; Seong-Hun Kim; Yoonah Kook
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.

Authors:  Chung-Chen Jane Yao; Eddie Hsiang-Hua Lai; Jenny Zwei-Chieng Chang; I Chen; Yi-Jane Chen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Mini-implant temporary anchorage devices: orthodontic applications.

Authors:  Mark R Yanosky; Jon D Holmes
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

8.  Enhancing the mechanical integrity of the implant-bone interface with BoneWelding technology: determination of quasi-static interfacial strength and fatigue resistance.

Authors:  Stephen J Ferguson; Urs Weber; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Joerg Mayer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.368

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  In-vitro evaluation of the effects of insertion and sterilization procedures on the mechanical and surface characteristics of mini screws.

Authors:  Civan Aved Hergel; Yasemin Bahar Acar; Mustafa Ates; Nazan Kucukkeles
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2019-01-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.