Literature DB >> 21271042

Inorganic particle analysis of dental impression elastomers.

Hugo Lemes Carlo1, Rodrigo Borges Fonseca, Carlos José Soares, Américo Bortolazzo Correr, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine quantitatively and qualitatively the inorganic particle fraction of commercially available dental elastomers. The inorganic volumetric fraction of two addition silicones (Reprosil Putty/Fluid and Flexitime Easy Putty/Fluid), three condensation silicones (Clonage Putty/Fluid, Optosil Confort/Xantopren VL and Silon APS Putty/Fluid), one polyether (Impregum Soft Light Body) and one polysulfide (Permlastic Light Body) was accessed by weighing a previously determined mass of each material in water before and after burning samples at 600 ºC, during 3 h. Unsettled material samples were soaked in acetone and chloroform for removal of the organic portion. The remaining filler particles were sputter-coated with gold evaluation of their morphology and size, under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Flexitime Easy Putty was the material with the highest results for volumetric particle fraction, while Impregum Soft had the lowest values. Silon 2 APS Fluid presented the lowest mean filler size values, while Clonage Putty had the highest values. SEM micrographs of the inorganic particles showed several morphologies - lathe-cut, spherical, spherical-like, sticks, and sticks mixed to lathe-cut powder. The results of this study revealed differences in particle characteristics among the elastometic materials that could lead to different results when testing mechanical properties.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21271042     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000600007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  4 in total

1.  Investigation of dental materials as skin simulants for forensic skin/skull/brain model impact testing.

Authors:  Lisa Falland-Cheung; Nicholas Pittar; Darryl Tong; J Neil Waddell
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  A Novel Nontraumatic Gingival Retraction Method for a Single-Unit Crown Impression.

Authors:  Hozaifa Al-Nasser; Nabil Al-Houri; Anas Mouti; Heba Alajami
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods.

Authors:  Satheesh B Haralur; Majed Saad Toman; Abdullah Ali Al-Shahrani; Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-12-14

4.  Viscosity effects of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials on the accuracy of the stone die produced.

Authors:  Warren Ho; Liang Lin Seow; Ammar Musawi
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2018-04-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.