Literature DB >> 21270608

Comparisons of surgical outcomes, complications, and costs between laparotomy and laparoscopy in early-stage ovarian cancer.

Maria Lee1, Sang Wun Kim, Jiheum Paek, San Hui Lee, Ga Won Yim, Jae Hoon Kim, Jae Wook Kim, Young Tae Kim, Eun Ji Nam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes, complications, and costs between laparoscopic staging and laparotomic staging for early-stage ovarian cancer.
METHODS: We evaluated 113 patients who underwent laparoscopy (n = 26) or laparotomy (n = 87) for staging. We retrospectively analyzed patients' demographics and operative variables, including operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node count, hospital stay, complications, postoperative pain, and return to normal activity. In addition, costs for laparoscopy and laparotomy groups were also compared.
RESULTS: The mean operation time was longer in laparoscopy group compared to laparotomy group (227.6 minutes vs 184.6 minutes, P = 0.016). The laparoscopy group had less intraoperative blood loss, less transfusion requirement, shorter postoperative hospital stay, earlier general diet intake, shorter time to adjuvant chemotherapy, and lower postoperative pain score after 6, 24, and 48 hours compared with the laparotomy group. The mean number of lymph node retrievals was comparable between the groups. The incidence of operative complications was lower in the laparoscopy group (7.7%) relative to the laparotomy group (23.0%). The total average cost for staging completed via laparotomy was $1237 and that via laparoscopy was $1998, with significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Complete surgical staging by laparoscopy was achieved in all cases with comparable operative time and less operative complications compared with laparotomy for selected patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. However, the operation costs for laparoscopy were significantly higher than the operation costs for laparotomic staging surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21270608     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318208c71c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  15 in total

1.  The impact of perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion on survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay L Morgenstern Warner; Sean C Dowdy; Janice R Martin; Maureen A Lemens; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; Karl C Podratz; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Concordance of laparoscopic and laparotomic peritoneal cancer index using a two-step surgical protocol to select patients for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Federico Migliorelli; Mathilde Del; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Manon Daix; Sarah Bétrian; Erwan Gabiache; Gisèle Balagué; Sophie Leclerc; Eliane Mery; Laurence Gladieff; Gwénaël Ferron; Alejandra Martinez
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Minimally invasive surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer: Association between hospital surgical volume and short-term perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Erica J Chang; Shinya Matsuzaki; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Kazuhide Matsushima; Brendan H Grubbs; Maximilian Klar; Lynda D Roman; Anil K Sood; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Current and Future Status of Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  S Rimbach; K Neis; E Solomayer; U Ulrich; D Wallwiener
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Role of minimally invasive surgery in early ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Chul Kwon Lim; Dae Yeon Kim; Angela Cho; Ji-Yeong Choi; Jeong-Yeol Park; Yong-Man Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 6.  Current Recommendations for Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Federica Perelli; Luigi Pedone; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

Review 7.  Is It the Time for Laparoscopic Management of Early-stage Ovarian Malignancies?

Authors:  Tanitra Tantitamit; Chyi-Long Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 8.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Frederico S Falcetta; Theresa A Lawrie; Lídia Rf Medeiros; Maria Ines da Rosa; Maria I Edelweiss; Airton T Stein; Alice Zelmanowicz; Anaelena B Moraes; Roselaine R Zanini; Daniela D Rosa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-13

9.  Differences in Epidural and Analgesic Use in Patients with Apparent Stage I Endometrial Cancer Treated by Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Results from the Randomised LACE Trial.

Authors:  Jannah Baker; Monika Janda; David Belavy; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-07-14

10.  Comparison of the prognosis and recurrence of apparent early-stage ovarian tumors treated with laparoscopy and laparotomy: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Shuying Fan; Yang Xiang; Hua Duan; Li Sun
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.