BACKGROUND: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is caused by mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) or calsequestrin (Casq2) and can be difficult to treat. The class Ic antiarrhythmic drug flecainide blocks RyR2 channels and prevents CPVT in mice and humans. It is not known whether other class I antiarrhythmic drugs also block RyR2 channels and to what extent RyR2 channel inhibition contributes to antiarrhythmic efficacy in CPVT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We first measured the effect of all class I antiarrhythmic drugs marketed in the United States (quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lidocaine, mexiletine, flecainide, and propafenone) on single RyR2 channels incorporated into lipid bilayers. Only flecainide and propafenone inhibited RyR2 channels, with the S-enantiomer of propafenone having a significantly lower potency than R-propafenone or flecainide. In Casq2(-/-) myocytes, the propafenone enantiomers and flecainide significantly reduced arrhythmogenic Ca(2+) waves at clinically relevant concentrations, whereas Na(+) channel inhibitors without RyR2 blocking properties did not. In Casq2(-/-) mice, 5 mg/kg R-propafenone or 20 mg/kg S-propafenone prevented exercise-induced CPVT, whereas procainamide (20 mg/kg) or lidocaine (20 mg/kg) were ineffective (n=5 to 9 mice, P<0.05). QRS duration was not significantly different, indicating a similar degree of Na(+) channel inhibition. Clinically, propafenone (900 mg/d) prevented ICD shocks in a 22-year-old CPVT patient who had been refractory to maximal standard drug therapy and bilateral stellate ganglionectomy. CONCLUSIONS: RyR2 cardiac Ca(2+) release channel inhibition appears to determine efficacy of class I drugs for the prevention of CPVT in Casq2(-/-) mice. Propafenone may be an alternative to flecainide for CPVT patients symptomatic on β-blockers.
BACKGROUND: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is caused by mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) or calsequestrin (Casq2) and can be difficult to treat. The class Ic antiarrhythmic drug flecainide blocks RyR2 channels and prevents CPVT in mice and humans. It is not known whether other class I antiarrhythmic drugs also block RyR2 channels and to what extent RyR2 channel inhibition contributes to antiarrhythmic efficacy in CPVT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We first measured the effect of all class I antiarrhythmic drugs marketed in the United States (quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lidocaine, mexiletine, flecainide, and propafenone) on single RyR2 channels incorporated into lipid bilayers. Only flecainide and propafenone inhibited RyR2 channels, with the S-enantiomer of propafenone having a significantly lower potency than R-propafenone or flecainide. In Casq2(-/-) myocytes, the propafenone enantiomers and flecainide significantly reduced arrhythmogenic Ca(2+) waves at clinically relevant concentrations, whereas Na(+) channel inhibitors without RyR2 blocking properties did not. In Casq2(-/-) mice, 5 mg/kg R-propafenone or 20 mg/kg S-propafenone prevented exercise-induced CPVT, whereas procainamide (20 mg/kg) or lidocaine (20 mg/kg) were ineffective (n=5 to 9mice, P<0.05). QRS duration was not significantly different, indicating a similar degree of Na(+) channel inhibition. Clinically, propafenone (900 mg/d) prevented ICD shocks in a 22-year-old CPVT patient who had been refractory to maximal standard drug therapy and bilateral stellate ganglionectomy. CONCLUSIONS:RyR2 cardiac Ca(2+) release channel inhibition appears to determine efficacy of class I drugs for the prevention of CPVT in Casq2(-/-) mice. Propafenone may be an alternative to flecainide for CPVT patients symptomatic on β-blockers.
Authors: N Sumitomo; K Harada; M Nagashima; T Yasuda; Y Nakamura; Y Aragaki; A Saito; K Kurosaki; K Jouo; M Koujiro; S Konishi; S Matsuoka; T Oono; S Hayakawa; M Miura; H Ushinohama; T Shibata; I Niimura Journal: Heart Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Guoxin Kang; Steven F Giovannone; Nian Liu; Fang-Yu Liu; Jie Zhang; Silvia G Priori; Glenn I Fishman Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Alex V Postma; Isabelle Denjoy; Theo M Hoorntje; Jean-Marc Lupoglazoff; Antoine Da Costa; Pascale Sebillon; Marcel M A M Mannens; Arthur A M Wilde; Pascale Guicheney Journal: Circ Res Date: 2002-10-18 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: H Lahat; E Pras; T Olender; N Avidan; E Ben-Asher; O Man; E Levy-Nissenbaum; A Khoury; A Lorber; B Goldman; D Lancet; M Eldar Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-10-25 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Fredrick A Hilliard; Derek S Steele; Derek Laver; Zhaokang Yang; Sylvain J Le Marchand; Nagesh Chopra; David W Piston; Sabine Huke; Björn C Knollmann Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Silvia G Priori; Carlo Napolitano; Mirella Memmi; Barbara Colombi; Fabrizio Drago; Maurizio Gasparini; Luciano DeSimone; Fernando Coltorti; Raffaella Bloise; Roberto Keegan; Fernando E S Cruz Filho; Gabriele Vignati; Abraham Benatar; Angelica DeLogu Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hyun Seok Hwang; Florentin R Nitu; Yi Yang; Kafa Walweel; Laetitia Pereira; Christopher N Johnson; Michela Faggioni; Walter J Chazin; Derek Laver; Alfred L George; Razvan L Cornea; Donald M Bers; Björn C Knollmann Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Pei-Chi Yang; Jonathan D Moreno; Mao-Tsuen Jeng; Xander H T Wehrens; Sergei Noskov; Colleen E Clancy Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 5.182