Literature DB >> 21267543

Physiotherapy-guided versus home-based, unsupervised rehabilitation in isolated anterior cruciate injuries following surgical reconstruction.

Erik Hohmann1, Kevin Tetsworth, Adam Bryant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome after ACL reconstruction between a group of patients receiving a standardized, supervised, physiotherapy-guided rehabilitation programme and a group of patients who followed an unsupervised, home-based rehabilitation programme.
METHODS: Forty patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament injuries were allocated to either a supervised physiotherapy intervention group or home-based exercise group. Patients were investigated by an independent examiner pre-operative, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery using the following outcome measures: Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale, functional hopping tests, and isometric and isokinetic strength assessments.
RESULTS: Both groups improved significantly (P = 0.01-0.04) following 12 months after surgery. The median Lysholm score increased from 57 (34-90) to 94 (90-100) in the supervised group and 60 (41-87) to 97 (95-100) in the unsupervised group. The median Tegner Activity Scale increased from 3 (2-8) to 6 (3-8) in the supervised group and 4 (2-8) to 5 (3-10) in the unsupervised group. The combined mean symmetry indices for the hopping tests improved from 77.3 ± 18.7 to 86.8 ± 11.1 (supervised) and from 78.1 ± 30.5 to 88.3 ± 10.9 (unsupervised). Isometric and isokinetic strength symmetry indices for knee extension improved from 68.9 ± 23.5 to 82.8 ± 11.9, respectively, 63.7 + 22.8 to 82.7 + 15.1 in the supervised group and from 73.6 ± 20.5 to 76.5 ± 17.9, respectively, 69.5 ± 24.3 to 76.9 ± 16.9 in the unsupervised group. Eccentric strength symmetry indices for knee extension improved from 67.9 ± 27.7 to 87.8 ± 6.8 in the supervised group and from 71.3 ± 17.8 to 82.6 ± 15.6 in the unsupervised group.
CONCLUSION: This study could not demonstrate a benefit in a rehabilitation programme supervised by a physiotherapist in our population compared to an unsupervised cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21267543     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1386-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.

Authors:  N Sernert; J Kartus; K Köhler; S Stener; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: which graft is best?

Authors:  Orrin H Sherman; Michael B Banffy
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Joseph A Abate; Braden C Fleming; Claude E Nichols
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees.

Authors:  S D Barber; F R Noyes; R E Mangine; J W McCloskey; W Hartman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Rationale and protocol for postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.

Authors:  L Podesta; M F Sherman; J R Bonamo; I Reiter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The effects of the number and frequency of physical therapy treatments on selected outcomes of treatment in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M S De Carlo; K E Sell
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Exercise for treating isolated anterior cruciate ligament injuries in adults.

Authors:  Amanda H Trees; Tracey E Howe; John Dixon; Lisa White
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

8.  Functional assessment and muscle strength before and after reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament lesions.

Authors:  Suzanne N de Jong; Danny R van Caspel; Michiel J van Haeff; Daniël B F Saris
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 9.  Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark C Forster; Ian W Forster
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  14 in total

1.  Time for a Different Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Educate and Create Realistic Expectations.

Authors:  Joshua Robert Zadro; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Effect of Longer versus Shorter Duration of Supervised Physiotherapy after ACL Reconstruction on the Vertical Jump Landing Limb Symmetry.

Authors:  Aleksandra Królikowska; Andrzej Czamara; Łukasz Szuba; Paweł Reichert
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Kinesio taping as a treatment method in the acute phase of ACL reconstruction: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Selvin Balki; Hanım Eda Göktaş; Zekeriya Öztemur
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 4.  Quality and Variability of Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols From Academic Orthopaedic Surgery Programs for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Adam C Lieber; Michael E Steinhaus; Joseph N Liu; Daniel Hurwit; Theresa Chiaia; Sabrina M Strickland
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-02

Review 5.  Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests.

Authors:  William T Davies; Gregory D Myer; Paul J Read
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Supervised Rehabilitation May Lead to Better Outcome than Home-Based Rehabilitation Up to 1 Year after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hye Chang Rhim; Jin Hyuck Lee; Seo Jun Lee; Jin Sung Jeon; Geun Kim; Kwang Yeol Lee; Ki-Mo Jang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Temporal Utilization of Physical Therapy Visits After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Patrick J Burroughs; Joseph B Kahan; Harold G Moore; Jonathan N Grauer; Elizabeth C Gardner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-19

8.  Patient Satisfaction Using a Home-Based Rehabilitation Protocol for the Non-Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Héctor J Aguado; Paula S Ventura-Wichner; Laura Perez-Hickman; Isabel Polo-Pérez; Juan A Alonso-Olmo; María Bragado; Adela Pereda-Manso; Mario Martínez-Zarzuela; Virginia García-Virto; Clarisa Simón-Pérez; Emilio J Barajas; Miguel A Martín-Ferrero
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 9.  Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Abrams; Joshua D Harris; Anil K Gupta; Frank M McCormick; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-01-21

10.  Patients' preferences for occupational therapy after upper extremity fractures: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Joshua Kyle Napora; Haley Demyanovich; Alexandra Mulliken; Kimberly Oslin; Raymond Pensy; Gerard Slobogean; Robert V O'Toole; Nathan O'Hara
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.