Literature DB >> 21267152

Management of cervical dysplasia.

J F Sangster, T M Gerace.   

Abstract

Since the 1982 Revised Task Force Report on Cervical Cancer Screening, controversy has developed over the management of mild dysplasia. Recent developments have led some investigators to recommend colposcopy for any degree of cervical dysplasia because of significant false-negative factors in Pap smear reporting and the observation that some patients have lesions more severe than suggested by the cytology. Over a four-year period, all patients with dysplastic smears in the practice were evaluated by colposcopic examination and biopsy. In 20 cases of mild dysplasia, five cases of cancer in situ were found. Considerable variation from the Task Force's report was noted in cytopathologists' recommendations for cytological smears. Judging from the results of this audit, colposcopic evaluation of all dysplastic smears should be considered.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 21267152      PMCID: PMC2327672     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  7 in total

1.  The abnormal pap smear: a rationale for follow up.

Authors:  H A Toews
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Pap smear practice patterns of family physicians.

Authors:  T M Gerace; J F Sangster
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Experience with 40,000 Papanicolaou smears.

Authors:  H F Sandmire; S D Austin; R C Bechtel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Optimising the age, number of tests, and test interval for cervical screening in Canada.

Authors:  Y Shun-Zhang; A B Miller; G J Sherman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Effect of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in Alberta.

Authors:  A A Starreveld; G B Hill; L B Brown; M Koch
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Challenges in screening for cancer of the cervix: delivery, technology and evaluation of programs.

Authors:  P P Morgan
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed.

Authors:  N D Morell; J R Taylor; R N Snyder; H K Ziel; A Saltz; S Willie
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.661

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.