Literature DB >> 21266926

Movement variability in the golf swing of male and female skilled golfers.

Sean A Horan1, Kerrie Evans, Justin J Kavanagh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the complexity of movement, the swings of skilled golfers are considered to be highly consistent. Interestingly, no direct investigation of movement variability or coupling variability during the swings of skilled golfers has occurred.
PURPOSE: To determine whether differences in movement variability exist between male and female skilled golfers during the downswing of the full golf swing.
METHODS: Three-dimensional thorax, pelvis, hand, and clubhead data were collected from 19 male (mean ± SD: age = 26 ± 7 yr) and 19 female (age = 25 ± 7 yr) skilled golfers. Variability of segmental movement and clubhead trajectory were examined at three phases of the downswing using discrete (SD) and continuous analyses (spanning set), whereas variability of intersegment coupling was examined using average coefficient of correspondence.
RESULTS: Compared with males, females exhibited higher thorax and pelvis variability for axial rotation at the midpoint of the downswing and ball contact (BC). Similarly, thorax-pelvis coupling variability was higher for females than males at both the midpoint of the downswing and BC. Regardless of thorax and pelvis motion, the variability of hand and clubhead trajectory sequentially decreased from the top of the backswing to BC for both males and females.
CONCLUSIONS: Male and female skilled golfers use different upper body movement strategies during the downswing while achieving similarly low levels of clubhead trajectory variability at BC. It is apparent that the priority of skilled golfers is to progressively minimize hand and clubhead trajectory variability toward BC, despite the individual motion or coupling of the thorax and pelvis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21266926     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318210fe03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  7 in total

1.  The required number of trials for biomechanical analysis of a golf swing.

Authors:  Anna C Severin; Sally G Barnes; Stewart A Tackett; C Lowry Barnes; Erin M Mannen
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.832

2.  Kinematic Parameters of Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis and Their Inter- and Intra-Individual Variability.

Authors:  Ziemowit Bańkosz; Sławomir Winiarski
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Low back pain and golf: A review of biomechanical risk factors.

Authors:  Nathan Edwards; Clark Dickin; Henry Wang
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2020-03-09

Review 4.  The Biomechanics of the Modern Golf Swing: Implications for Lower Back Injuries.

Authors:  Michael H Cole; Paul N Grimshaw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Improving performance in golf: current research and implications from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Kerrie Evans; Neil Tuttle
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Estimate Kinematic Parameters and Variability in the Table Tennis Topspin Forehand Stroke.

Authors:  Ziemowit Bańkosz; Sławomir Winiarski
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 1.781

7.  Scaling sports equipment for children promotes functional movement variability.

Authors:  Tim Buszard; Alessandro Garofolini; Machar Reid; Damian Farrow; Luca Oppici; David Whiteside
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.