Literature DB >> 21266563

Real-time interpolation for true 3-dimensional ultrasound image volumes.

Songbai Ji1, David W Roberts, Alex Hartov, Keith D Paulsen.   

Abstract

We compared trilinear interpolation to voxel nearest neighbor and distance-weighted algorithms for fast and accurate processing of true 3-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) image volumes. In this study, the computational efficiency and interpolation accuracy of the 3 methods were compared on the basis of a simulated 3DUS image volume, 34 clinical 3DUS image volumes from 5 patients, and 2 experimental phantom image volumes. We show that trilinear interpolation improves interpolation accuracy over both the voxel nearest neighbor and distance-weighted algorithms yet achieves real-time computational performance that is comparable to the voxel nearest neighbor algrorithm (1-2 orders of magnitude faster than the distance-weighted algorithm) as well as the fastest pixel-based algorithms for processing tracked 2-dimensional ultrasound images (0.035 seconds per 2-dimesional cross-sectional image [76,800 pixels interpolated, or 0.46 ms/1000 pixels] and 1.05 seconds per full volume with a 1-mm(3) voxel size [4.6 million voxels interpolated, or 0.23 ms/1000 voxels]). On the basis of these results, trilinear interpolation is recommended as a fast and accurate interpolation method for rectilinear sampling of 3DUS image acquisitions, which is required to facilitate subsequent processing and display during operating room procedures such as image-guided neurosurgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21266563      PMCID: PMC3761367          DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.2.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of freehand three-dimensional ultrasound reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  R Rohling; A Gee; L Berman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  A Fenster; D B Downey; H N Cardinal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Freehand 3D ultrasound reconstruction algorithms--a review.

Authors:  Ole Vegard Solberg; Frank Lindseth; Hans Torp; Richard E Blake; Toril A Nagelhus Hernes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Mutual-information-based image to patient re-registration using intraoperative ultrasound in image-guided neurosurgery.

Authors:  Songbai Ji; Ziji Wu; Alex Hartov; David W Roberts; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Three-dimensional imaging with stereotactic ultrasonography.

Authors:  J W Trobaugh; D J Trobaugh; W D Richard
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Intraoperative fiducial-less patient registration using volumetric 3D ultrasound: a prospective series of 32 neurosurgical cases.

Authors:  Xiaoyao Fan; David W Roberts; Songbai Ji; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Intraoperative patient registration using volumetric true 3D ultrasound without fiducials.

Authors:  Songbai Ji; David W Roberts; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.