OBJECTIVES: We performed an in vitro study to assess the precision and accuracy of particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) data acquired using a clinically available portable ultrasound system via comparison with stereo optical PIV. METHODS: The performance of ultrasound PIV was compared with optical PIV on a benchmark problem involving vortical flow with a substantial out-of-plane velocity component. Optical PIV is capable of stereo image acquisition, thus measuring out-of-plane velocity components. This allowed us to quantify the accuracy of ultrasound PIV, which is limited to in-plane acquisition. The system performance was assessed by considering the instantaneous velocity fields without extracting velocity profiles by spatial averaging. RESULTS: Within the 2-dimensional correlation window, using 7 time-averaged frames, the vector fields were found to have correlations of 0.867 in the direction along the ultrasound beam and 0.738 in the perpendicular direction. Out-of-plane motion of greater than 20% of the in-plane vector magnitude was found to increase the SD by 11% for the vectors parallel to the ultrasound beam direction and 8.6% for the vectors perpendicular to the beam. CONCLUSIONS: The results show a close correlation and agreement of individual velocity vectors generated by ultrasound PIV compared with optical PIV. Most of the measurement distortions were caused by out-of-plane velocity components.
OBJECTIVES: We performed an in vitro study to assess the precision and accuracy of particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) data acquired using a clinically available portable ultrasound system via comparison with stereo optical PIV. METHODS: The performance of ultrasound PIV was compared with optical PIV on a benchmark problem involving vortical flow with a substantial out-of-plane velocity component. Optical PIV is capable of stereo image acquisition, thus measuring out-of-plane velocity components. This allowed us to quantify the accuracy of ultrasound PIV, which is limited to in-plane acquisition. The system performance was assessed by considering the instantaneous velocity fields without extracting velocity profiles by spatial averaging. RESULTS: Within the 2-dimensional correlation window, using 7 time-averaged frames, the vector fields were found to have correlations of 0.867 in the direction along the ultrasound beam and 0.738 in the perpendicular direction. Out-of-plane motion of greater than 20% of the in-plane vector magnitude was found to increase the SD by 11% for the vectors parallel to the ultrasound beam direction and 8.6% for the vectors perpendicular to the beam. CONCLUSIONS: The results show a close correlation and agreement of individual velocity vectors generated by ultrasound PIV compared with optical PIV. Most of the measurement distortions were caused by out-of-plane velocity components.
Authors: R Thomas Collins; Megan E Laughlin; Sean M Lang; Elijah H Bolin; Joshua A Daily; Hanna A Jensen; Morten O Jensen Journal: Prog Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2019-03-05
Authors: Fei Wei; John Westerdale; Eileen M McMahon; Marek Belohlavek; Jeffrey J Heys Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Katharine H Fraser; Christian Poelma; Bin Zhou; Eleni Bazigou; Meng-Xing Tang; Peter D Weinberg Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Iman Borazjani; John Westerdale; Eileen M McMahon; Prathish K Rajaraman; Jeffrey J Heys; Marek Belohlavek Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 2.238