Literature DB >> 21265985

Impact of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy on the survival of patients with pathological T3b prostate cancer.

Sameer A Siddiqui1, Stephen A Boorjian, Michael L Blute, Laureano J Rangel, Eric J Bergstralh, Robert Jeffrey Karnes, Igor Frank.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) at radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 12,115 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 2002 to identify patients with pT3bN0 prostate cancer who received adjuvant ADT (n= 191). These patients were matched by clinical and pathological variables to a group of patients with pT3b prostate cancer who did not receive adjuvant ADT. Median postoperative follow-up was 10 years. Clinical endpoints included biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), systemic progression-free survival (SPFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent adjuvant ADT experienced improved 10-year BPFS (60% vs 16%, P < 0.001), LRFS (87% vs 76%, P= 0.002), SPFS (91% vs 78%, P= 0.004) and CSS (94% vs 87%, P= 0.037). Overall survival was not significantly different between groups (75% vs 69%, P= 0.12). Both luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.46; P < 0.001) and bilateral orchiectomy (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06-0.31; P < 0.001) improved BPFS. When stratified by type of ADT (hormonal therapy vs orchiectomy), there was no difference in survival outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant ADT improves local, and systemic control after radical prostatectomy for pT3b prostate cancer. There is no difference in survival between patients receiving medical hormonal therapy vs patients undergoing orchiectomy. Given the lack of improvement in overall survival, continued investigation is needed to identify the cohort of pT3b patients at highest risk for cancer progression and therefore most likely to benefit from a multimodal treatment approach.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21265985     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09565.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival of patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a Bayesian model averaging approach.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Won Kang; Koon Ho Rha; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) without adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Aurélien Forgues; François Rozet; François Audenet; Adil Ouzzane; Rafaël Sanchez-Salas; Eric Barret; Marc Galiano; Dominique Prapotnich; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Beyond castration-defining future directions in the hormonal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Saroj Niraula; Kim Chi; Anthony Michael Joshua
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 4.  Current role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tanya B Dorff; L Michael Glode
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.

Authors:  Xun Shangguan; Baijun Dong; Yanqing Wang; Fan Xu; Xiaoguang Shao; Jianjun Sha; Yinjie Zhu; Jiahua Pan; Wei Xue
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  The long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy for very high-risk prostate cancer pT3b-T4 N0-1 on definitive histopathology.

Authors:  Jan Kliment; Boris Elias; Katarina Baluchova; Jan Kliment
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-01-03

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival outcomes of first-line treatment options in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun H Lei; Liang R Liu; Qiang Wei; Shi B Yan; Tu R Song; Fu S Lin; Lu Yang; De H Cao; Hai C Yuan; Wen B Xue; Xiao Lv; Ying C Cai; Hao Zeng; Ping Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Androgen receptor profiling predicts prostate cancer outcome.

Authors:  Suzan Stelloo; Ekaterina Nevedomskaya; Henk G van der Poel; Jeroen de Jong; Geert J L H van Leenders; Guido Jenster; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Andries M Bergman; Wilbert Zwart
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 12.137

9.  Long-term results of radical prostatectomy with immediate adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for pT3N0 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yuzuri Tsurumaki Sato; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Motofumi Suzuki; Tetsuya Fujimura; Tohru Nakagawa; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Haruki Kume; Teppei Morikawa; Masashi Fukayama; Yukio Homma
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 10.  The role of radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.