Literature DB >> 21265818

The effect of neuromuscular blockade on mask ventilation.

R D Warters1, T A Szabo, F G Spinale, S M DeSantis, J G Reves.   

Abstract

We wished to test the hypothesis that neuromuscular blockade facilitates mask ventilation. In order reliably and reproducibly to assess the efficiency of mask ventilation, we developed a novel grading scale (Warters scale), based on attempts to generate a standardised tidal volume. Following induction of general anaesthesia, a blinded anaesthesia provider assessed mask ventilation in 90 patients using our novel grading scale. The non-blinded anaesthesiologist then randomly administered rocuronium or normal saline. After 2 min, mask ventilation was reassessed by the blinded practitioner. Rocuronium significantly improved ventilation scores on the Warters scale (mean (SD) 2.3 (1.6) vs 1.2 (0.9), p<0.001). In a subgroup of patients with a baseline Warters scale value of >3 (i.e. difficult to mask ventilate; n=14), the ventilation scores also showed significant improvement (4.2 (1.2) vs 1.9 (1.0), p=0.0002). Saline administration had no effect on ventilation scores. Our data indicate that neuromuscular blockade facilitates mask ventilation. We discuss the implications of this finding for unexpected difficult airway management and for the practice of confirming adequate mask ventilation before the administration of neuromuscular blockade.
© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21265818     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06601.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  25 in total

Review 1.  [S1 guidelines on airway management].

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSeal(®) in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Atsushi Fujiwara; Nobuyasu Komasawa; Isao Nishihara; Shinichiro Miyazaki; Shinichi Tatsumi; Wataru Nishimura; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  [Mandatory mask ventilation before relaxation. Where is the evidence?].

Authors:  A Jacomet; T Schnider
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Facemask for Positive Pressure Ventilation.

Authors:  Tod A Brown; Tamas A Szabo; Kathryn H Bridges; Michel J Sabbagh; William R Hand; Bethany J Wolf; Robert D Warters
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  JSA airway management guideline 2014: to improve the safety of induction of anesthesia.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Anaesthetic management of acute airway obstruction.

Authors:  Patrick Wong; Jolin Wong; May Un Sam Mok
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Anesthetic Management in Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Toru Yamamoto; Noriko Miyazawa; Shinichi Yamamoto; Hiroshi Kawahara
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2017

Review 9.  How can we improve mask ventilation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea during anesthesia induction?

Authors:  Yumi Sato; Aya Ikeda; Teruhiko Ishikawa; Shiroh Isono
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Should anesthesiologists have to confirm effective facemask ventilation before administering the muscle relaxant?

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Priebe
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.