Literature DB >> 21265461

Spatial variability in ecosystem services: simple rules for predator-mediated pest suppression.

F J J A Bianchi1, N A Schellhorn, Y M Buckley, H P Possingham.   

Abstract

Agricultural pest control often relies on the ecosystem services provided by the predators of pests. Appropriate landscape and habitat management for pest control services requires an understanding of insect dispersal abilities and the spatial arrangement of source habitats for pests and their predators. Here we explore how dispersal and habitat configuration determine the locations where management actions are likely to have the biggest impact on natural pest control. The study focuses on the early colonization phase before predator reproduction takes place and when pest populations in crops are still relatively low. We developed a spatially explicit simulation model in which pest populations grow exponentially in pest patches and predators disperse across the landscape from predator patches. We generated 1000 computer-simulated landscapes in which the performance of four typical but different predator groups as biological control agents was evaluated. Predator groups represented trait combinations of poor and good dispersal ability and density-independent and density-dependent aggregation responses toward pests. Case studies from the literature were used to inform the parameterization of predator groups. Landscapes with a small nearest-neighbor distance between pest and predator patches had the lowest mean pest density at the landscape scale for all predator groups, but there can be high variation in pest density between the patches within these landscapes. Mobile and strongly aggregating predators provide the best pest suppression in the majority of landscape types. Ironically, this result is true except in landscapes with small nearest-neighbor distances between pest and predator patches. The pest control potential of mobile predators can best be explained by the mean distance between a pest patch and all predator patches in the landscape, whereas for poorly dispersing predators the distance between a pest patch and the nearest predator patch is the best explanatory variable. In conclusion, the spatial arrangement of source habitats for natural enemies of agricultural pest species can have profound effects on their potential to colonize crops and suppress pest populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21265461     DOI: 10.1890/09-1278.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  8 in total

1.  Effects of local and landscape factors on population dynamics of a cotton pest.

Authors:  Yves Carrière; Peter B Goodell; Christa Ellers-Kirk; Guillaume Larocque; Pierre Dutilleul; Steven E Naranjo; Peter C Ellsworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effects of agricultural intensification on ability of natural enemies to control aphids.

Authors:  Zi-Hua Zhao; Cang Hui; Da-Han He; Bai-Lian Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Production and robustness of a Cacao agroecosystem: effects of two contrasting types of management strategies.

Authors:  Rodolphe Sabatier; Kerstin Wiegand; Katrin Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Hymenopteran Parasitoids of Aphid Pests within Australian Grain Production Landscapes.

Authors:  Samantha E Ward; Paul A Umina; Sarina Macfadyen; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  More pests but less pesticide applications: Ambivalent effect of landscape complexity on conservation biological control.

Authors:  Patrizia Zamberletti; Khadija Sabir; Thomas Opitz; Olivier Bonnefon; Edith Gabriel; Julien Papaïx
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Species composition and diversity of parasitoids and hyper-parasitoids in different wheat agro-farming systems.

Authors:  Zi-hua Zhao; Jun-He Liu; Da-Han He; Xiao-qin Guan; Wen-Hui Liu
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

7.  Functional diversity positively affects prey suppression by invertebrate predators: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arran Greenop; Ben A Woodcock; Andy Wilby; Samantha M Cook; Richard F Pywell
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition.

Authors:  Daniel S Karp; Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer; Timothy D Meehan; Emily A Martin; Fabrice DeClerck; Heather Grab; Claudio Gratton; Lauren Hunt; Ashley E Larsen; Alejandra Martínez-Salinas; Megan E O'Rourke; Adrien Rusch; Katja Poveda; Mattias Jonsson; Jay A Rosenheim; Nancy A Schellhorn; Teja Tscharntke; Stephen D Wratten; Wei Zhang; Aaron L Iverson; Lynn S Adler; Matthias Albrecht; Audrey Alignier; Gina M Angelella; Muhammad Zubair Anjum; Jacques Avelino; Péter Batáry; Johannes M Baveco; Felix J J A Bianchi; Klaus Birkhofer; Eric W Bohnenblust; Riccardo Bommarco; Michael J Brewer; Berta Caballero-López; Yves Carrière; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Luis Cayuela; Mary Centrella; Aleksandar Ćetković; Dominic Charles Henri; Ariane Chabert; Alejandro C Costamagna; Aldo De la Mora; Joop de Kraker; Nicolas Desneux; Eva Diehl; Tim Diekötter; Carsten F Dormann; James O Eckberg; Martin H Entling; Daniela Fiedler; Pierre Franck; F J Frank van Veen; Thomas Frank; Vesna Gagic; Michael P D Garratt; Awraris Getachew; David J Gonthier; Peter B Goodell; Ignazio Graziosi; Russell L Groves; Geoff M Gurr; Zachary Hajian-Forooshani; George E Heimpel; John D Herrmann; Anders S Huseth; Diego J Inclán; Adam J Ingrao; Phirun Iv; Katja Jacot; Gregg A Johnson; Laura Jones; Marina Kaiser; Joe M Kaser; Tamar Keasar; Tania N Kim; Miriam Kishinevsky; Douglas A Landis; Blas Lavandero; Claire Lavigne; Anne Le Ralec; Debissa Lemessa; Deborah K Letourneau; Heidi Liere; Yanhui Lu; Yael Lubin; Tim Luttermoser; Bea Maas; Kevi Mace; Filipe Madeira; Viktoria Mader; Anne Marie Cortesero; Lorenzo Marini; Eliana Martinez; Holly M Martinson; Philippe Menozzi; Matthew G E Mitchell; Tadashi Miyashita; Gonzalo A R Molina; Marco A Molina-Montenegro; Matthew E O'Neal; Itai Opatovsky; Sebaastian Ortiz-Martinez; Michael Nash; Örjan Östman; Annie Ouin; Damie Pak; Daniel Paredes; Soroush Parsa; Hazel Parry; Ricardo Perez-Alvarez; David J Perović; Julie A Peterson; Sandrine Petit; Stacy M Philpott; Manuel Plantegenest; Milan Plećaš; Therese Pluess; Xavier Pons; Simon G Potts; Richard F Pywell; David W Ragsdale; Tatyana A Rand; Lucie Raymond; Benoît Ricci; Chris Sargent; Jean-Pierre Sarthou; Julia Saulais; Jessica Schäckermann; Nick P Schmidt; Gudrun Schneider; Christof Schüepp; Frances S Sivakoff; Henrik G Smith; Kaitlin Stack Whitney; Sonja Stutz; Zsofia Szendrei; Mayura B Takada; Hisatomo Taki; Giovanni Tamburini; Linda J Thomson; Yann Tricault; Noelline Tsafack; Matthias Tschumi; Muriel Valantin-Morison; Mai Van Trinh; Wopke van der Werf; Kerri T Vierling; Ben P Werling; Jennifer B Wickens; Victoria J Wickens; Ben A Woodcock; Kris Wyckhuys; Haijun Xiao; Mika Yasuda; Akira Yoshioka; Yi Zou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.