Literature DB >> 21265450

Unite research with what citizens do for fun: "recreational monitoring" of marine biodiversity.

Stefano Goffredo1, Francesco Pensa, Patrizia Neri, Antonio Orlandi, Maria Scola Gagliardi, Angela Velardi, Corrado Piccinetti, Francesco Zaccanti.   

Abstract

Institutes often lack funds and manpower to perform large-scale biodiversity monitoring. Citizens can be involved, contributing to the collection of data, thus decreasing costs. Underwater research requires specialist skills and SCUBA certification, and it can be difficult to involve volunteers. The aim of this study was to involve large numbers of recreational divers in marine biodiversity monitoring for increasing the environmental education of the public and collecting data on the status of marine biodiversity. Here we show that thousands of recreational divers can be enrolled in a short time. Using specially formulated questionnaires, nonspecialist volunteers reported the presence of 61 marine taxa encountered during recreational dives, performed as regular sport dives. Validation trials were carried out to assess the accuracy and consistency of volunteer-recorded data, and these were compared to reference data collected by an experienced researcher. In the majority of trials (76%) volunteers performed with an accuracy and consistency of 50-80%, comparable to the performance of conservation volunteer divers on precise transects in other projects. The recruitment of recreational divers involved the main diving and tour operators in Italy, a popular scientific magazine, and mass media. During the four-year study, 3825 divers completed 18757 questionnaires, corresponding to 13539 diving hours. The volunteer-sightings-based index showed that in the monitored area the biodiversity status did not change significantly within the project time scale, but there was a significant negative correlation with latitude, suggesting improved quality in the southernmost areas. This trend could be related to the presence of stressors in the northern areas and has been supported by investigations performed by the Italian Ministry of the Environment. The greatest limitation with using volunteers to collect data was the uneven spatial distribution of samples. The benefits were the considerable amounts of data collected over short time periods and at low costs. The successful development of citizen-based monitoring programs requires open-mindedness in the academic community; advantages of citizen involvement in research are not only adding large data sets to the ecological knowledge base but also aiding in the environmental education of the public.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21265450     DOI: 10.1890/09-1546.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  When giants turn up: sighting trends, environmental influences and habitat use of the manta ray Manta alfredi at a coral reef.

Authors:  Fabrice R A Jaine; Lydie I E Couturier; Scarla J Weeks; Kathy A Townsend; Michael B Bennett; Kym Fiora; Anthony J Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Engaging the broader community in biodiversity research: the concept of the COMBER pilot project for divers in ViBRANT.

Authors:  Christos Arvanitidis; Sarah Faulwetter; Georgios Chatzigeorgiou; Lyubomir Penev; Olaf Bánki; Thanos Dailianis; Evangelos Pafilis; Michail Kouratoras; Eva Chatzinikolaou; Lucia Fanini; Aikaterini Vasileiadou; Christina Pavloudi; Panagiotis Vavilis; Panayota Koulouri; Costas Dounas
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  Participating in a Citizen Science Monitoring Program: Implications for Environmental Education.

Authors:  Simone Branchini; Marta Meschini; Claudia Covi; Corrado Piccinetti; Francesco Zaccanti; Stefano Goffredo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Acoustic telemetry validates a citizen science approach for monitoring sharks on coral reefs.

Authors:  Gabriel M S Vianna; Mark G Meekan; Tova H Bornovski; Jessica J Meeuwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Observer aging and long-term avian survey data quality.

Authors:  Robert G Farmer; Marty L Leonard; Joanna E Mills Flemming; Sean C Anderson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  A Citizen Science Approach: A Detailed Ecological Assessment of Subtropical Reefs at Point Lookout, Australia.

Authors:  Chris Roelfsema; Ruth Thurstan; Maria Beger; Christine Dudgeon; Jennifer Loder; Eva Kovacs; Michele Gallo; Jason Flower; K-le Gomez Cabrera; Juan Ortiz; Alexandra Lea; Diana Kleine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stirring the strategic direction of scuba diving marine Citizen Science: A survey of active and potential participants.

Authors:  Serena Lucrezi; Martina Milanese; Marco Palma; Carlo Cerrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mapping species distributions: a comparison of skilled naturalist and lay citizen science recording.

Authors:  René van der Wal; Helen Anderson; Annie Robinson; Nirwan Sharma; Chris Mellish; Stuart Roberts; Ben Darvill; Advaith Siddharthan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Evaluating range-expansion models for calculating nonnative species' expansion rate.

Authors:  Sonja Preuss; Matthew Low; Anna Cassel-Lundhagen; Asa Berggren
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Mangroves Enhance Reef Fish Abundance at the Caribbean Regional Scale.

Authors:  Joseph E Serafy; Geoffrey S Shideler; Rafael J Araújo; Ivan Nagelkerken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.