Literature DB >> 21265446

Thresholds in forest bird occurrence as a function of the amount of early-seral broadleaf forest at landscape scales.

M G Betts1, J C Hagar, J W Rivers, J D Alexander, K McGarigal, B C McComb.   

Abstract

Recent declines in broadleaf-dominated, early-seral forest globally as a function of intensive forest management and/or fire suppression have raised concern about the viability of populations dependent on such forest types. However, quantitative information about the strength and direction of species associations with broadleaf cover at landscape scales are rare. Uncovering such habitat relationships is essential for understanding the demography of species and in developing sound conservation strategies. It is particularly important to detect points in habitat reduction where rates of population decline may accelerate or the likelihood of species occurrence drops rapidly (i.e., thresholds). Here, we use a large avian point-count data set (N = 4375) from southwestern and northwestern Oregon along with segmented logistic regression to test for thresholds in forest bird occurrence as a function of broadleaf forest and early-seral broadleaf forest at local (150-m radius) and landscape (500-2000-m radius) scales. All 12 bird species examined showed positive responses to either broadleaf forest in general, and/or early-seral broadleaf forest. However, regional variation in species response to these conditions was high. We found considerable evidence for landscape thresholds in bird species occurrence as a function of broadleaf cover; threshold models received substantially greater support than linear models for eight of 12 species. Landscape thresholds in broadleaf forest ranged broadly from 1.35% to 24.55% mean canopy cover. Early-seral broadleaf thresholds tended to be much lower (0.22-1.87%). We found a strong negative relationship between the strength of species association with early-seral broadleaf forest and 42-year bird population trends; species most associated with this forest type have declined at the greatest rates. Taken together, these results provide the first support for the hypothesis that reductions in broadleaf-dominated early-seral forest due to succession and intensive forest management have led to population declines of constituent species in the Pacific northwestern United States. Forest management treatments that maintain or restore even small amounts of broadleaf vegetation could mitigate further declines.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21265446     DOI: 10.1890/09-1305.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  9 in total

1.  Determining the size of a complete disturbance landscape: multi-scale, continental analysis of forest change.

Authors:  Brian Buma; Jennifer K Costanza; Kurt Riitters
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Threshold responses of forest birds to landscape changes around exurban development.

Authors:  Marcela Suarez-Rubio; Scott Wilson; Peter Leimgruber; Todd Lookingbill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A quantitative evaluation of the conservation umbrella of spotted owl management areas in the Sierra Nevada.

Authors:  Ryan D Burnett; L Jay Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  No evidence for a link between forest herbicides and offspring sex ratio in a migratory songbird using high-throughput molecular sexing.

Authors:  James W Rivers; Jennifer L Houtz; Matthew G Betts; Brent M Horton
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Impacts of the Northwest Forest Plan on forest composition and bird populations.

Authors:  Benjamin T Phalan; Joseph M Northrup; Zhiqiang Yang; Robert L Deal; Josée S Rousseau; Thomas A Spies; Matthew G Betts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Avian species richness in relation to intensive forest management practices in early seral tree plantations.

Authors:  Jay E Jones; Andrew J Kroll; Jack Giovanini; Steven D Duke; Tana M Ellis; Matthew G Betts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessing regional and interspecific variation in threshold responses of forest breeding birds through broad scale analyses.

Authors:  Yntze van der Hoek; Rosalind Renfrew; Lisa L Manne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bat response to differing fire severity in mixed-conifer forest California, USA.

Authors:  Michael R Buchalski; Joseph B Fontaine; Paul A Heady; John P Hayes; Winifred F Frick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Habitat selection and ranges of tolerance: how do species differ beyond critical thresholds?

Authors:  Mary Ann Cunningham; Douglas H Johnson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.