Literature DB >> 21265344

Single-incision laparoscopic placement of an adjustable gastric band versus conventional multiport laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparative study.

Alan A Saber1, Tarek H El-Ghazaly, Alain Elain, Aditya V Dewoolkar.   

Abstract

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is rapidly becoming the focal point of attraction for early adopters of minimally invasive surgery nationwide. Having achieved a rapid crossover to the realm of advanced surgical procedures, SILS has shown remarkable versatility and adaptability, making it no longer limited to basic laparoscopic procedures. We report our experience performing laparoscopic placement of gastric bands with an emphasis on comparison of the single-incision laparoscopic approach with the conventional multiport laparoscopic approach. From December 2008 to September 2009, 27 patients underwent laparoscopic placement of an adjustable gastric band at Michigan State University/Kalamazoo Center for Medical Studies. This included 15 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic gastric banding and 12 patients who underwent conventional multiport laparoscopic gastric banding procedures. The overall pain score was found to be significantly less in the SILS group than that for the conventional multiport laparoscopic gastric banding group with a statistically significant P value of 0.012. The operating time was found to be significantly less in the multiport group with a P value of 0.000. Differences in immediate postoperative pain scores, analgesia, and the overall length of hospital stay were found to be statistically insignificant. Single-incision laparoscopic gastric banding is associated with significantly less overall postoperative pain than the conventional laparoscopic approach; in addition, it provides improved cosmetic outcome despite a modest increase in operative time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21265344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  10 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chaorong Xue; Bingqiang Lin; Zhengyuan Huang; Zhi Chen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Single-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is effective and safe: 756 cases in an academic medical center.

Authors:  Bradley F Schwack; Richard Novack; Heekoung Youn; Christine Ren Fielding; Marina S Kurian; George A Fielding
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Initial learning experience of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) gastric banding: finding predictors of success.

Authors:  John R Cheregi; Fred Tiesenga; Alfonso Torquati; Rami Lutfi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jie Hua; Jian Gong; Bin Xu; Tingsong Yang; Zhenshun Song
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Single site and conventional totally extraperitoneal techniques for uncomplicated inguinal hernia repair: A comparative study.

Authors:  Felipe Brandão Corrêa de Araújo; Eduardo Simão Starling; Marco Maricevich; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Single and multiple incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a matched comparison.

Authors:  Saurav Chakravartty; Beth Murgatroyd; David Ashton; Ameet Patel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  A case-controlled matched-pair cohort study of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic gastric band patients in a single US center with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sivamainthan Vithiananthan; Daniel Gero; Jason Y Zhang; Jason T Machan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bikini Line Sleeve Gastrectomy: Initial Report.

Authors:  Tamer N Abdelbaki
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Effectiveness and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery vs conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric diseases: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Yang; Zhaoting Bu; Maoqin He; Yue Lin; Yuting Jiang; Da Chen; Kaibing Liu; Jun Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: technique, feasibility, safety and learning curve.

Authors:  A J Osborne; R Clancy; G W B Clark; C Wong
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.