Literature DB >> 21264656

Peristalsis gap sign at cine magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing strangulated small bowel obstruction: feasibility study.

Taro Takahara1, Thomas C Kwee, Hiroki Haradome, Kei Aoki, Hiroyoshi Matsuoka, Akihisa Nakamura, Keita Honya, Mitsuyuki Takahashi, Tomohiro Yamashita, Peter R Luijten, Yutaka Imai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing strangulated small bowel obstruction (SBO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 38 patients with clinically confirmed SBO who had undergone cine MRI. Cine MRI scans were evaluated regarding the presence of the "peristalsis gap sign" (referring to an akinetic or severely hypokinetic closed loop), indicating strangulation. Computed tomography (CT) was performed in 34 of 38 patients with (n = 25) or without (n = 9) contrast enhancement. CT images were evaluated using a combination of criteria (presence of hyperattenuation, poor contrast enhancement, mesenteric edema, wall thickening, massive ascites) indicating strangulation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of cine MRI and CT for the diagnosis of strangulation were calculated and compared using surgical findings and the clinical course as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of cine MRI were 100%, 92.9%, 83.3%, and 100%, respectively; and those of CT (of which 26.5% was performed without contrast enhancement) were 66.7%, 92.0%, 75.0%, and 88.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (P = 0.375).
CONCLUSION: Cine MRI is a feasible and promising technique for diagnosing strangulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264656     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0508-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  16 in total

1.  Imaging bowel obstruction: a comparison between fast magnetic resonance imaging and helical computed tomography.

Authors:  D P Beall; B J Fortman; B C Lawler; F Regan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 2.  Current management of small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Awori J Hayanga; Kirsten Bass-Wilkins; Gregory B Bulkley
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Imaging of acute small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Savvas Nicolaou; Brian Kai; Stephen Ho; Jenny Su; Karim Ahamed
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Small bowel obstruction: what to look for.

Authors:  Ana Catarina Silva; Madalena Pimenta; Luís S Guimarães
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Fast MR imaging and the detection of small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  F Regan; D P Beall; M E Bohlman; R Khazan; A Sufi; D C Schaefer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Etiology of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  G Miller; J Boman; I Shrier; P H Gordon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Cine magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel: comparison of different oral contrast media.

Authors:  P Asbach; C Breitwieser; G Diederichs; S Eisele; D Kivelitz; M Taupitz; M Zeitz; B Hamm; C Klessen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  The use of MRI in bowel obstruction.

Authors:  C K Chou; G C Liu; L T Chen; T S Jaw
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1993

9.  Value of cine MRI for better visualization of the proximal small bowel in normal individuals.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Roberto Vargas; Chikako Tanaka; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Cine magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of peristalsis of small bowel with longitudinal ulcer in Crohn disease: preliminary results.

Authors:  Yoshio Kitazume; Shiro Satoh; Hiroko Hosoi; Osamu Noguchi; Hitoshi Shibuya
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  6 in total

1.  Early MRI findings of small bowel obstruction: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Daniela Berritto; Francesca Iacobellis; Maria Paola Belfiore; Claudia Rossi; Luca Saba; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Noncontrast MRI of acute abdominal pain caused by gastrointestinal lesions: indications, protocol, and image interpretation.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Shinichi Ota; Norihisa Nitta; Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Acceleration of small bowel motility after oral administration of dai-kenchu-to (TJ-100) assessed by cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Shinichi Ohta; Nguyen Dai Hung Linh; Tulyeubai Syerikjan; Sachiko Kaida; Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi; Satoshi Murata; Toru Obata; Masaji Tani; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  MR Imaging-based Evaluation of Mesenteric Ischemia Caused by Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction and Mesenteric Venous Occlusion: An Experimental Study Using Rabbits.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ota; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Sayaka Misaki; Takayasu Iwai; Akinaga Sonoda; Ken-Ichi Mukaisho; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  A Systematic Review of Technical Parameters for MR of the Small Bowel in non-IBD Conditions over the Last Ten Years.

Authors:  Jingyu Lu; Ziling Zhou; John N Morelli; Hao Yu; Yan Luo; Xuemei Hu; Zhen Li; Daoyu Hu; Yaqi Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Diagnostic utility of CT for small bowel obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengyan Li; Ling Zhang; Xijiao Liu; Fang Yuan; Bin Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.