Literature DB >> 21264560

Aversive, appetitive and flavour avoidance responses in the presence of contextual cues.

Adam R Brown1, Alexander M Penney, Darlene M Skinner, Gerard M Martin.   

Abstract

Appetitive, aversive and avoidance responses to a flavoured solution in distinct contexts were examined. Rats placed in either a white or black box were given access to saccharin. Consumption was followed by an injection of a toxin in one but not the other box. Rats showed more aversive responses in anticipation of and during the presentation of saccharin in the box paired with the toxin than in the box paired with vehicle. The reverse was true for appetitive responses. The acquisition of conditioned avoidance paralleled the acquisition of aversive and appetitive responses. These findings demonstrate that the toxin does not have to overlap exposure to contextual cues to produce conditioned aversive responses, that the aversive and appetitive responses to a flavour can be modulated by visually distinct environments that predict the toxin, and that conditioned avoidance and conditioned aversions develop simultaneously during acquisition. Thus, environmental cues can modulate anticipatory nausea and may prove helpful in the control of nausea in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264560     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-010-0008-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  16 in total

1.  Exposure to a lithium-paired context elicits gaping in rats: A model of anticipatory nausea.

Authors:  Cheryl L Limebeer; Geoffrey Hall; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-06-05

2.  Chin rub CRs may reflect conditioned sickness elicited by a lithium-paired sucrose solution.

Authors:  L A Parker; K B MacLeod
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Lithium-induced context aversion in rats as a model of anticipatory nausea in humans.

Authors:  M Rodriguez; M Lopez; M Symonds; G Hall
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2000-12

4.  Wheel running induces conditioned taste aversion in rats trained while hungry and thirsty.

Authors:  B T Lett; V L Grant
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1996 Apr-May

5.  Rewarding drugs produce taste avoidance, but not taste aversion.

Authors:  L A Parker
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Comparing immune activation (lipopolysaccharide) and toxin (lithium chloride)-induced gustatory conditioning: lipopolysaccharide produces conditioned taste avoidance but not aversion.

Authors:  Shelley K Cross-Mellor; Martin Kavaliers; Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Taste avoidance and taste aversion: evidence for two different processes.

Authors:  Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Exposure to a context previously associated with nausea elicits conditioned gaping in rats: a model of anticipatory nausea.

Authors:  Cheryl L Limebeer; Jon P Krohn; Shelley Cross-Mellor; Devin E Litt; Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Glucocorticoids attenuate taste aversions produced by toxins in rats.

Authors:  S Revusky; G M Martin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats.

Authors:  H J Grill; R Norgren
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.989

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.