| Literature DB >> 21264108 |
Vkm Swamy1, Rs Setty, Mm Shankaraiah, Tm Jyothi, Sv Rajendra.
Abstract
Drug-drug interaction between esomeprazole at therapeutic and higher doses and sulfonylureas was studied. Sulfonylureas (tolbutamide 40 mg/kg and glibenclamide 40 µg/kg) were administered and the time to onset of hypoglycemia, the duration of the hypoglycemia, and the peak hypoglycemia were determined. Esomeprazole (1.8 mg/kg, 3.6 mg/kg, and 30 mg/kg) was administered for 8 days and its influence on sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia was studied. Therapeutic doses of esomeprazole, i.e., 1.8 mg/kg and 3.6 mg/kg dose did not influence the hypoglycemia induced by sulfonylureas. However, a higher dose, i.e., 30 mg/kg, did significantly enhance the duration of hypoglycemia and the peak hypolgycemia. Esomeprazole (30 mg/kg) by itself did not reduce the blood glucose levels; therefore, a pharmacodynamic type of drug interaction can be ruled out. Similarly, a pharmacokinetic type of drug interaction may be ruled out at therapeutic doses. The CYP isoenzyme system involved in the metabolism of sulfonylureas are not very sensitive to esomeprazole and the dose and frequency of administration of sulfonylurea need not be readjusted when they are used concomitantly with esomeprazole (at therapeutic doses).Entities:
Keywords: Drug–drug interaction; esomeprazole; glibenclamide; tolbutamide
Year: 2010 PMID: 21264108 PMCID: PMC3019387 DOI: 10.4103/0975-1483.71624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Young Pharm ISSN: 0975-1483
Figure 1Blood glucose level with esomeprazole (30 mg/kg) in healthy rat
Percentage blood glucose reduction with tolbutamide in healthy albino rats before and after esomeprazole
| Esomeprazole (1.8 mg/kg) + tolbutamide (40 mg/kg) | Esomeprazole (3.6 mg/kg) + tolbutamide (40 mg/kg) | Esomeprazole (30 mg/kg) + tolbutamide (40 mg/kg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | After esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | Before esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | After esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | Before esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | After esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | |
| Fasting | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 0.5 | 28.27±3.70 | 14.16± 2.79 | 18.43±4.48 | 21.34±2.43 | 8.61±3.08 | 15.55±2.01 |
| 1.0 | 43.82±3.90 | 23.57 ± 2.66 | 25.90±4.38 | 28.58±3.78 | 24.34±3.78 | 41.70±2.04 |
| 2.0 | 50.78±5.43 | 31.20 ± 2.97 | 33.91±2.61 | 42.00±3.27 | 36.51±2.99 | 36.79±3.71 |
| 4.0 | 59.02±3.53 | 42.94 ± 1.52 | 46.89±3.33 | 54.29±2.10 | 48.27±4.15 | 52.81±1.45 |
| 6.0 | 68.47±2.01 | 52.45 ± 2.23 | 51.58±1.53 | 59.12±1.36 | 52.47±5.17 | 56.60±4.54 |
| 8.0 | 56.47 ± 3.44 | 65.45 ± 1.04 | 57.53±3.69 | 68.02±2.61 | 59.11±3.78 | 61.46±2.36 |
| 12.0 | 39.79 ± 4.62 | 56.84 ± 3.56 | 65.90±1.70 | 67.22±4.04 | 47.40±4.05 | 64.53±1.05 |
| 18.0 | 33.07 ± 3.93 | 43.87 ± 3.57 | 59.27±4.76 | 51.17±2.88 | 40.18±4.42 | 53.79±1.33 |
| 24.0 | 27.30 ± 5.76 | 33.44 ± 3.92 | 48.15±5.59 | 43.92±4.50 | 36.45±3.21 | 50.22±2.40 |
| 30.0 | 24.47 ± 5.82 | 29.76 ± 3.36 | 37.99±5.99 | 34.64±3.09 | 32.17±4.51 | 49.08±1.11 |
| 36.0 | 30.59 ± 9.32 | 22.10 ± 2.99 | 29.68±4.52 | 29.37±4.85 | 26.37±2.19 | 42.72±4.86 |
| 42.0 | 20.44 ± 4.47 | 17.30 ± 1.91 | 20.96±2.59 | 16.66±3.77 | 19.73±1.18 | 32.39±3.47 |
| 48.0 | 13.30 ± 3.32 | 9.45 ± 2.54 | 9.28±2.22 | 10.93 ± 2.39 | 8.18±3.18 | 20.63±3.53 |
Significant at P<0.05;
Highly significant at P<0.01;
Very highly significant at P<0.001
Percentage blood glucose reduction with glibenclamide in healthy albino rats before and after esomeprazole
| Esomeprazole (1.8 mg/kg) + glibenclamide (40 µg /kg) | Esomeprazole (3.6 mg/kg) + glibenclamide (40 µg /kg) | Esomeprazole (30 mg/kg) + glibenclamide (40 µg /kg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | After esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | Before esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | After esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | Before esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | After esomeprazole (mean±SEM) | |
| Fasting | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 0.5 | 28.96±3.78 | 13.58 ± 2.35 | 21.75±2.53 | 17.36± 5.41 | 16.36±1.72 | 42.91±1.04 |
| 1.0 | 44.91±4.02 | 23.35 ± 2.19 | 29.11 ± 3.90 | 25.71±4.87 | 38.80±8.81 | 64.16±0.85 |
| 2.0 | 52.05±5.59 | 31.26 ± 2.66 | 42.71 ± 3.30 | 36.16±2.80 | 42.43±9.72 | 70.52±0.52 |
| 4.0 | 60.49±3.65 | 43.39 ± 1.39 | 55.20 ± 1.97 | 47.56±3.55 | 57.51±3.00 | – |
| 6.0 | 70.17±2.09 | 53.32 ± 2.01 | 60.11 ± 1.09 | 52.69±1.76 | 64.97±1.42 | 72.05±4.93 |
| 8.0 | 58.07±3.55 | 66.72 ± 1.06 | 69.14±2.40 | 58.49±4.41 | 58.66±3.21 | 65.79±1.84 |
| 12.0 | 40.77±4.72 | 57.80 ± 3.57 | 68.29 ± 3.80 | 67.25±2.51 | 58.38±3.93 | 56.60±3.86 |
| 18.0 | 33.85±4.02 | 44.39±3.45 | 52.06±2.94 | 60.60±4.59 | 50.92±2.79 | 51.86±1.40 |
| 24.0 | 27.98±5.90 | 33.61±3.62 | 44.64±4.59 | 49.29±5.16 | 45.68±1.16 | – |
| 30.0 | 25.07±5.95 | 29.77±3.03 | 35.18±2.99 | 38.62±5.40 | 45.05±2.78 | 68.68±1.44 |
| 36.0 | 31.33±9.53 | 21.73±3.05 | 29.84±4.92 | 29.97±3.73 | 38.35±3.65 | 58.63±2.91 |
| 42.0 | 20.93±4.57 | 16.68±2.58 | 16.87±3.73 | 20.70±2.46 | 37.04±1.28 | 55.02±1.75 |
| 48.0 | 13.62±3.39 | 8.54±3.20 | 11.06±2.35 | 8.49±2.19 | 32.34±2.56 | 46.74±1.20 |
Significant at P<0.05;
Highly significant at P<0.01;
Very highly significant at P<0.001