Literature DB >> 21264062

Rapid acquisition of Gigapascal-high-pressure resistance by Escherichia coli.

Dietrich Vanlint1, Rachael Mitchell, Edward Bailey, Filip Meersman, Paul F McMillan, Chris W Michiels, Abram Aertsen.   

Abstract

Pressure and temperature are important environmental variables that influence living systems. However, while they vary over a considerable range on Earth and other planets, it has hardly been addressed how straightforwardly and to what extent cellular life can acquire resistance to extremes of these parameters within a defined genomic context and a limited number of generations. Nevertheless, this is a very pertinent question with respect to the penetration of life in allegedly inhospitable environments. In this study, directed evolution was used to reveal the potential of the nonsporulating and mesophilic model bacterium Escherichia coli to develop the ability to survive exposure to high temperature or pressure. While heat resistance could only marginally be increased, our data show that piezoresistance could readily and reproducibly be extended into the GPa range, thereby greatly exceeding the currently recognized maximum for growth or survival.
Copyright © 2011 Vanlint et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264062      PMCID: PMC3025523          DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00130-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mBio            Impact factor:   7.867


INTRODUCTION

The known edges of our biosphere are typically delineated by extremophilic bacteria and archaea that manage to resist the severe physical and/or chemical conditions encountered in these environments. As such, studies of microorganisms from marine hydrothermal vents show that the currently recognized upper temperature and pressure limits for growth are 121°C (1) and 120 MPa (2), respectively. Besides the existence of extremophiles, however, another and less documented reflection of bacterial adaptability is the capacity to develop resistance against inhospitable environments within a defined genomic content and a limited number of generations. Such directed evolution of bacterial resistance could yield clues as to the possibility of the existence or persistence of microbial life in extreme environments that so far have been inaccessible or unexplored by current observational techniques. In this context, we have examined how rapidly and to what extent a mesophilic and nonsporulating model bacterium such as Escherichia coli might adapt to lethal heat or high pressure (HP), two of the most important and general physical constraints on life. We followed a directed-evolution strategy in which an E. coli culture was iteratively challenged with progressively increasing temperatures or pressures. Between consecutive exposures to heat or HP, survivors were allowed to resuscitate and grow under standard conditions and thus automatically became enriched in the resulting population. After a number of such cycles, a single clone was purified from the population in order to compare its resistance profile to that of the original parent strain. The outcomes of these selection regimens are depicted in Fig. 1A and B for development of heat and HP resistance, respectively.
FIG 1

Directed evolution of E. coli K-12 MG1655 towards heat (at atmospheric pressure) (A) or HP (at ambient temperature) (B) resistance. An axenic culture of E. coli MG1655 was iteratively exposed to progressively intensifying temperature or pressure shocks (15 min each), with a resuscitation and growth step between consecutive treatments. Survival after each treatment was determined (blue diamonds) and expressed as log(N), in which N represents the number of survivors determined by plate counts and expressed as CFU per milliliter. At the end of both selection regimens, the most heat (red bars)- and pressure (black bars)-resistant clone that had enriched in the respective cultures was isolated and its acquired heat (A) and HP (B) resistance was determined and compared to that of the original parental strain (green bars). It should be noted that these selection profiles are representative of 20 and 4 independent trials for heat and HP resistance development, respectively. Further experimental details can be found in the supplemental material (Text S1).

Directed evolution of E. coli K-12 MG1655 towards heat (at atmospheric pressure) (A) or HP (at ambient temperature) (B) resistance. An axenic culture of E. coli MG1655 was iteratively exposed to progressively intensifying temperature or pressure shocks (15 min each), with a resuscitation and growth step between consecutive treatments. Survival after each treatment was determined (blue diamonds) and expressed as log(N), in which N represents the number of survivors determined by plate counts and expressed as CFU per milliliter. At the end of both selection regimens, the most heat (red bars)- and pressure (black bars)-resistant clone that had enriched in the respective cultures was isolated and its acquired heat (A) and HP (B) resistance was determined and compared to that of the original parental strain (green bars). It should be noted that these selection profiles are representative of 20 and 4 independent trials for heat and HP resistance development, respectively. Further experimental details can be found in the supplemental material (Text S1). The results immediately reveal that the developed heat resistance was only marginal, shifting the upper survival temperature by approximately 1.03-fold from 58.5 to 60.0°C (Fig. 1A, compare green and red bars). However, the developed piezoresistance was extraordinary, and the upper pressure limit for survival readily increased at least 3-fold from 600 MPa to 2 GPa (Fig. 1B, compare green and black bars). In fact, as many as ca. 1 in 104 cells of the HP-resistant population readily survived a 2-GPa treatment. While signs of alleged enzymatic activity in E. coli cells at 1.4 GPa have been reported previously (3, 4), these results provide the first irrevocable evidence of microbial survival at ≥2 GPa. It is also worth noting that the HP- and heat-resistant mutants displayed only a marginal cross-resistance against heat and HP, respectively (Fig. 1), indicating that the acquired adaptations are very specific for each stress and precluding any a priori causal link between HP and heat resistance. Importantly, GPa-HP-resistant E. coli mutants have been obtained in all four independent HP evolution experiments performed. Moreover, in addition to this reproducibility, the relative ease with which GPa resistance seems able to evolve in E. coli is further underscored by the fact that none of these independently isolated mutants displayed any obvious growth defects at atmospheric pressure (data not shown). Together, these observations seem to indicate that this bacterium has the genetic blueprint to acquire extreme levels of HP resistance when selection forces it to do so. This apparent predisposition might also be reflected by the fact that natural isolates of E. coli display a great intrinsic variability with regard to HP resistance in the 200- to 700-MPa range studied so far (5, 6, 7). To the best of our knowledge, the level of piezoresistance that E. coli developed during this study by far exceeds the currently recognized maximum for growth (i.e., 120 MPa) (2) or survival (i.e., 800 to 900 MPa) (8, 9) for any vegetative microorganism. In fact, it was generally assumed that vegetative microorganisms would never be able to survive exposures in the GPa range, as such pressures would irreversibly denature the proteome and disrupt membrane-related processes (10). Indeed, during in vitro studies most proteins unfold at pressures of 400 to 800 MPa and protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions are disrupted. Furthermore, lipid model systems of cell membranes already undergo unfavorable fluid-gel transitions in the 100- to 300-MPa range (10). However, the extent to which these processes are reversible in a cellular context is not known. Surprisingly, as shown in Fig. 1B, the evolved HP-resistant E. coli mutant displayed similar levels of survival when exposed to 1.2 and to 2 GPa. This could indicate that, despite the significant difference in their intensities, the two pressures have similar impacts on the cell that can be countered by the resistance mechanism. However, when we compared inactivation kinetics of the HP-resistant mutant at 800 MPa with that at 2 GPa, we found that the inactivation rate at 2 GPa was significantly lower than that at 800 MPa (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The latter result is clearly reflected in the corresponding decimal reduction times: D2 GPa = 16 min > D800 MPa = 6.5 min (Fig. S1). It should be noted that within the 1.2- to 2-GPa range, water undergoes subsequent transitions from liquid into ice-VI and ice-VII crystal forms, as predicted by its pressure-temperature phase diagram. However, it is unclear whether or not such phase transitions could somehow contribute to the resilience of the HP-resistant mutant at these pressures. In summary, we report on the extraordinary adaptive potential of a mesophilic nonsporulating bacterium to GPa-high pressures. These findings can have major implications in exploring the ecological boundaries for survival or adaption of cellular life with regard to HP as a limiting factor on Earth and perhaps other celestial bodies. Further analysis of the GPa-HP-resistant bacteria artificially evolved in this study will shed new light on how cells can safeguard the integrity of their proteins and membranes at these pressures and eventually how organisms can adapt to or have evolved from HP environments.
  9 in total

1.  Are cells viable at gigapascal pressures?

Authors:  A Aristides Yayanos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Extending the upper temperature limit for life.

Authors:  Kazem Kashefi; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Inactivation and recovery of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica and Staphylococcus aureus after high hydrostatic pressure treatments up to 900 MPa.

Authors:  Anna Jofré; Teresa Aymerich; Sara Bover-Cid; Margarita Garriga
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 4.  Origins of life and biochemistry under high-pressure conditions.

Authors:  Isabelle Daniel; Philippe Oger; Roland Winter
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 54.564

5.  Escherichia coli mutants resistant to inactivation by high hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  K J Hauben; D H Bartlett; C C Soontjens; K Cornelis; E Y Wuytack; C W Michiels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Variation in resistance to high hydrostatic pressure and rpoS heterogeneity in natural isolates of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  M Robey; A Benito; R H Hutson; C Pascual; S F Park; B M Mackey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Variation in resistance to hydrostatic pressure among strains of food-borne pathogens.

Authors:  H Alpas; N Kalchayanand; F Bozoglu; A Sikes; C P Dunne; B Ray
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Microbial activity at gigapascal pressures.

Authors:  Anurag Sharma; James H Scott; George D Cody; Marilyn L Fogel; Robert M Hazen; Russell J Hemley; Wesley T Huntress
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Pyrococcus CH1, an obligate piezophilic hyperthermophile: extending the upper pressure-temperature limits for life.

Authors:  Xiang Zeng; Jean-Louis Birrien; Yves Fouquet; Georgy Cherkashov; Mohamed Jebbar; Joël Querellou; Philippe Oger; Marie-Anne Cambon-Bonavita; Xiang Xiao; Daniel Prieur
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 10.302

  9 in total
  16 in total

Review 1.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on coastal bacterial community abundance and diversity.

Authors:  Angeliki Marietou; Douglas H Bartlett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  High-pressure tolerance in Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 and other non-piezophilic prokaryotes.

Authors:  Adrienne Kish; Patrick L Griffin; Karyn L Rogers; Marilyn L Fogel; Russell J Hemley; Andrew Steele
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Stress-Induced Evolution of Heat Resistance and Resuscitation Speed in Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATCC 43888.

Authors:  Elisa Gayán; Alexander Cambré; Chris W Michiels; Abram Aertsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Emergence and stability of high-pressure resistance in different food-borne pathogens.

Authors:  Dietrich Vanlint; Nele Rutten; Chris W Michiels; Abram Aertsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Quantitative High-Resolution Imaging of Live Microbial Cells at High Hydrostatic Pressure.

Authors:  Anais C Bourges; Alexander Lazarev; Nathalie Declerck; Karyn L Rogers; Catherine A Royer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Laboratory investigation of high pressure survival in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 into the gigapascal pressure range.

Authors:  Rachael Hazael; Fabrizia Foglia; Liya Kardzhaliyska; Isabelle Daniel; Filip Meersman; Paul McMillan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Adaptive laboratory evolution of Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 for growth at high hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  Angeliki Marietou; Alice T T Nguyen; Eric E Allen; Douglas H Bartlett
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Horizontal Transmission of Stress Resistance Genes Shape the Ecology of Beta- and Gamma-Proteobacteria.

Authors:  Shady Mansour Kamal; David J Simpson; Zhiying Wang; Michael Gänzle; Ute Römling
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Ecotype diversity and conversion in Photobacterium profundum strains.

Authors:  Federico M Lauro; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Taylor K S Richter; Nicola Vitulo; Steven Ferriera; Justin H Johnson; Douglas H Bartlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.