BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (AF) results in complex changes in the cardiomyocyte electrical and contractile functioning that promote atrial remodeling and the continuation of AF. Recently there has been a growing interest in understanding the role of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which are cytoprotective molecular chaperones, in the pathophysiology of AF. Several groups have examined HSP expression in patients with AF but have yielded mixed results. To allow for better consistency and reproducibility between subjects, we utilized canine models to reproduce AFpromoting conditions to better investigate the role of HSPs in the pathophysiology of AF. METHODS: AF promoting conditions were simulated in canine models with fifteen adult mongrel dogs (20.6 to 36.0 kg) divided into three groups: (1) Control (n=5), (2) two week ventricular tachypacing (VTP) induced congestive heart failure (CHF) (n=5), and (3) one week atrial tachypacying (ATP) (n=5). Quick frozen right atrial free wall tissue samples were used for protein isolation and were analyzed via Western blotting with data was expressed as a relative ratio and were analyzed using a two-tailed, unpaired ttest and significance was set at p < 0.05. The expression levels of HSP 90, 70, and 25 were studied along with the phosphorylation status of HSP27 at serine-78. RESULTS: We first examined the effects of the ATP and CHF heart models on the expression of a select group of HSPs via Western Blot. We found that there was no significant difference in levels of expression of HSP 90, 70, or 25 when either ATP or CHF models were compared to control canines. The phosphorylation status of HSP27 was significantly decreased in the CHF canine model when compared to control (p < 0.0111) and it tended towards a decrease in the ATP canine model when compared to control (p=0.0923). CONCLUSION: This study showed that even though the expression levels of HSPs may remain constant, there are protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events that occur in AF that may have important consequences in its pathophysiology. It is therefore necessary to investigate the full scale of HSP modifications during AF and AF-promoting conditions.
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (AF) results in complex changes in the cardiomyocyte electrical and contractile functioning that promote atrial remodeling and the continuation of AF. Recently there has been a growing interest in understanding the role of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which are cytoprotective molecular chaperones, in the pathophysiology of AF. Several groups have examined HSP expression in patients with AF but have yielded mixed results. To allow for better consistency and reproducibility between subjects, we utilized canine models to reproduce AFpromoting conditions to better investigate the role of HSPs in the pathophysiology of AF. METHODS:AF promoting conditions were simulated in canine models with fifteen adult mongrel dogs (20.6 to 36.0 kg) divided into three groups: (1) Control (n=5), (2) two week ventricular tachypacing (VTP) induced congestive heart failure (CHF) (n=5), and (3) one week atrial tachypacying (ATP) (n=5). Quick frozen right atrial free wall tissue samples were used for protein isolation and were analyzed via Western blotting with data was expressed as a relative ratio and were analyzed using a two-tailed, unpaired ttest and significance was set at p < 0.05. The expression levels of HSP 90, 70, and 25 were studied along with the phosphorylation status of HSP27 at serine-78. RESULTS: We first examined the effects of the ATP and CHF heart models on the expression of a select group of HSPs via Western Blot. We found that there was no significant difference in levels of expression of HSP 90, 70, or 25 when either ATP or CHF models were compared to control canines. The phosphorylation status of HSP27 was significantly decreased in the CHFcanine model when compared to control (p < 0.0111) and it tended towards a decrease in the ATPcanine model when compared to control (p=0.0923). CONCLUSION: This study showed that even though the expression levels of HSPs may remain constant, there are protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events that occur in AF that may have important consequences in its pathophysiology. It is therefore necessary to investigate the full scale of HSP modifications during AF and AF-promoting conditions.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac
arrhythmia found in the general population and is
associated with both morbidity and mortality (1). Poorly
controlled AF can result in many complications such as
stroke and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, and
according to the Framingham Heart Study, AF is
associated with a decrease in overall survival (2). The
maintenance of AF is promoted by AF-induced atrial remodeling, which involves complex changes in the
cardiomyocyte electrical and contractile function (3).
The proteins involved in AF-induced atrial remodeling,
and their respective molecular mechanisms are
currently being delineated. One group of proteins,
known as the heat shock proteins (HSPs), are molecular
chaperons that are induced by many physiological
stressors, and are known to convey a protective function
in cells during times of stress (4). The HSPs are proteins
of interest that play a key cytoprotective role in AF and
may represent a novel molecular target in AF therapy.
However, the underlying mechanism of their action in
AF pathogenesis remains unclear.There has been growing interest in understanding the
role of HSPs in the pathophysiology of AF. Recently,
several groups have examined HSP expression in
patients with AF, relative to those in sinus rhythm (SR),
but these studies yielded mixed results. Although HSP
expression was often found to be increased in patients
with AF, there has been no clear consensus as to which
groups of HSPs (HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, HSP27) are
most effected (5-7). A more recent study indicated that
ischemia-induced AF is prevented by the induction of
exogenous HSP, and suggested that atrial ischemia in
itself may activate HSP production (8).Patients with AF experience a wide variation of
severity and duration of symptoms. This degree of
variability between subjects makes previous studies
with only a limited number of human subjects
unreliable and therefore it offers a possible explanation
for why there has been no agreement in which HSPs are
involved in the pathophysiology of AF. To allow for a
better understanding of the pathophysiology of AF, it is
therefore necessary to utilize an animal model which
has the added benefit by allowing for control over the
AF promoting conditions. In this study, AF-promoting
conditions were simulated in canine models by two
week ventricular tachypacing (VTP), which is a canine
model of congestive heart failure (CHF), and by atrial
tachypacing (ATP). Both atrial and ventricular
tachypacying in canines is known to produce conditions
conducive to atrial remodeling similar to that found in
AF. In this current study the expression of HSP70,
HSP90, and HSP25 were analyzed in right atrial tissue
samples. Given that the phosphorylation status of small
HSPs, such as HSP27 and HSP25 (HSP25 is an
ortholog of HSP27), is crucial in the regulation of their
function and cellular localization, the phosphorylation
status of HSP27 was evaluated in both AF-promoting
canine models as a means to further elucidate the role of
HSPs in AF cytoprotection in vivo.
METHODS
Animal Model and Cardiomyocyte Isolation
The animal model was prepared as previously
described (9). In brief, fifteen adult mongrel dogs (20.6
to 36.0 kg) were divided into three groups: (1) Control
(n=5), (2) two week ventricular tachypacing (VTP)
induced congestive heart failure (CHF) (n=5), and (3)
one week atrial tachypacying (ATP) (n=5). CHFdogs
had unipolar pacing leads inserted fluoroscopically into
the right ventricular apex, which were programmed at
240 bpm for 2 weeks. ATP remodeling was induced by
1 week of right atrial pacing at 400 bpm after AV node
ablation as previously described (10). The experimental
protocols were reviewed and approved by the Montreal Heart Institute Animal Research Ethics Committee.On the final day of study the dogs were anesthetized
with morphine (2 mg/kg SC) and alpha-chloralose (120
mg/kg IV, followed by 29.25 mg/kg per hour) and
mechanically ventilated. Right and left atria
preparations were dissected and fast-frozen (9). RA and
LA cells were stored separately in Tyrode solution with
200 μmol/L Ca2+. In this study, right atrial samples
were used.
Protein Isolation
Quick frozen right atrial free wall tissue samples were
used for protein isolation. Tissue samples were placed
in Ripa buffer (1% IGEPAL, 0.5% Sodium
deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and Beta-mercaptoethanol)
containing protease inhibitors (Complete mini, EDTA
free protease inhibitor cocktail tablets from ROCHE)
and phosphatase inhibitors (sodium fluoride, betaglycerol
phosphate, sodium orthovanadate, microcystin,
EGTA, and EDTA). Samples were homogenized and
placed on ice for 20 minutes and centrifuged at 3000
rpm for 10mins at 4°C. The resultant supernatant was
collected and centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 15 minutes
at 4°C. The final supernatant was collected and lysate
concentrations were quantified using the Bradford
Assay.
Western Blot Analysis
Tissue extracts (30 μg) were separated on a 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore,
Bedford, MA) and blocked for 1 hour at room
temperature using 5% milk in TBST. Membranes were
incubated with primary antibody (1:2000; anti- HSP25,
HSP70, HSP90, P-ser78HSP27 from StressGen) over
night at 4°C. The blots were then washed 3 times for 15
minutes with TTBS and then incubated for 1h with the
appropriate HRP-conjugated antibody (1:10000; antirabbit
and anti-mouse). The blots were washed four
times with TTBS. Immuno-complexes were detected
using ECL and visualized on film. Bands were
quantified via densitometry and standardized to
GAPDH.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as a relative ratio and were
analyzed using a two-tailed, unpaired t-test and
significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS
Relationship between ATP and CHF Canine Models
and HSP Expression
Canine models were utilized to provide a greater
degree of standardization and reproducibility not
possible when studying tissue samples from patients.
We first examined the effects of the ATP and CHF heart models on the expression of a select group of HSPs via
Western Blot. With an n=5 for each of the control, ATP
and CHF groups we found there was no significant
change in expression levels of HSP25 in Control vs.
CHF and Control vs. ATP (Figure 1). We also examined
expression levels of other HSPs which have previously
been shown to be related with AF. Analysis of
expression levels of HSP70 (Figure 2) and HSP90
(Figure 3) again showed no significant difference
between the experimental dogs (ATP and CHF) and the
control dogs.
Figure 1:
Graphs show the relative expression of HSP25, along with
the corresponding Western Blots in control dogs (n=5) versus A)
Ventricular tachypacing model of CHF (n=5), p= 0.7405 and B) ATP
(n=5), p=0.7728. Protein expression levels were unchanged in either
ATP or CHF models.
Figure 2:
Western Blots and corresponding data showing the relative
expression of HSP70 in control dogs (n=5) versus A) Ventricular
tachypacing model of CHF (n=5), p= 0.8874 and B) ATP (n=5),
p=0.4597.Protein expression level were unchanged in either ATP of
CHF models.
Figure 3:
Western Blots and corresponding data showing the relative
expression of HSP90 in control dogs (n=5) versus A) Ventricular
tachypacing model of CHF (n=5), p= 0.2155 and B) ATP (n=5),
p=0.4630. Protein expression levels were unchanged in either ATP or
CHF models.
Graphs show the relative expression of HSP25, along with
the corresponding Western Blots in control dogs (n=5) versus A)
Ventricular tachypacing model of CHF (n=5), p= 0.7405 and B) ATP
(n=5), p=0.7728. Protein expression levels were unchanged in either
ATP or CHF models.Western Blots and corresponding data showing the relative
expression of HSP70 in control dogs (n=5) versus A) Ventricular
tachypacing model of CHF (n=5), p= 0.8874 and B) ATP (n=5),
p=0.4597.Protein expression level were unchanged in either ATP of
CHF models.Western Blots and corresponding data showing the relative
expression of HSP90 in control dogs (n=5) versus A) Ventricular
tachypacing model of CHF (n=5), p= 0.2155 and B) ATP (n=5),
p=0.4630. Protein expression levels were unchanged in either ATP or
CHF models.
HSP27 Phosphorylation Status is Reduced by
ATP and CHF
HSP27 has three known phosphorylation sites (ser15,
ser78, and ser82) (11). The phosphorylation status of
HSP27 is known have effects on cellular localization
along with regulating its function as a molecular
chaperone. To determine whether the phosphorylation
status of HSP27 is affected in ATP and/or CHFcanine
models we examined the phosphorylation state on
serine-78, which is known to be an important
phosphorylation site in determining HSP27’s cellular
location (11). Phosphorylation was analyzed via Western blot with control, ATP, and CHF on the same
15 well gel with n=5 for each group. As seen in Figure 4, there was a trend towards decreased HSP27
phosphorylation in ATP, relative to the controls,
although it failed to reach significance (p=0.0923).
However, The CHF group, however, showed a
significant decrease in the phosphorylation of HSP27
compared to the controls (p < 0.0111).
Figure 4:
Western Blots and corresponding data showing the relative
levels of phosphorylated HSP27 (ser-78) in control dogs (n=5)
compared to the ATP group (n=5), p=0.0923, and the CHF group
(n=5), p=0.0111. *P<0.05
Western Blots and corresponding data showing the relative
levels of phosphorylated HSP27 (ser-78) in control dogs (n=5)
compared to the ATP group (n=5), p=0.0923, and the CHF group
(n=5), p=0.0111. *P<0.05
DISCUSSION
To date the effects of AF-promoting conditions on
HSP27 phosphorylation status has not been widely
studied. We demonstrated in this study that the
phosphorylation status of HSP27 is decreased in both
the CHF and ATPcanine models of AF. It is known that
the phosphorylation of two serine residues (ser-78 and
ser-82) is necessary for HSP27 localization into the
nucleus (11). During conditions of stress, HSP27 is
phosphorylated and translocated into the nucleus where
it may protect against DNA damage (11). Also,
dissociation of HSP27 oligermers by phosphorylation
has been shown to stabilization F-actin and inhibit of
actin degradation (12). This evidence suggests that
phosphorylation is needed for HSP27 to convey a
protective function. Our study showed that phosphorylation of at least one serine residue (ser-78) is
significantly decreased in the canine model of CHF.
Although the phosphorylation of HSP27 also tended to
be decreased in the ATP group, these effects were
inconsistent between samples and might be attributed to
individual variations between the canine subjects.
According to the results in our current study, it could be
inferred that during sustained periods of AF-promoting
conditions, endogenous HSP27 is unlikely to convey a
protective effect. Decreased phosphorylation would
hinder the cytoprotective role of HSP27 and allow for
atrial remodeling, thus promoting AF maintenance.
However, other studies have shown that large oligomers
of HSP27 are necessary for it to exhibit chaperone
functions, and that phosphorylation causes a
dissociation of HSP27 into tetramers, which is not an
effective chaperone (12). Therefore, a decrease in
phosphorylation, as seen in this present study, could
allow for HSP27 to act as a better chaperone in the
cytoplasm and provide resistance against stress. The
findings that non-phosphorylated HSP27 oligomers
confer resistance to the cytotoxic effects of H2O2,
manadione, and TNFα, and that phosphorylated
mutants of HSP27 convey less of a protective function
supports this claim (13).It is widely acknowledged that HSP27 and other
chaperone proteins are cytoprotective during conditions
of stress. However, it is apparent that there is not yet a
clear mechanism as to how the phosphorylation status
of HSP27 affects its protective function. In our study,
we had a statistically significant decrease in
phosphorylation in the CHF model of AF. According to
our current understanding of HSP27 phosphorylation,
as discussed above, these results can be interpreted in
two contrasting ways: 1) the observed decrease in
phosphorylation, and thus a decrease in HSP27’s
protective function, allows for atrial remodeling and
therefore the maintenance of AF, or 2) the decreased
phosphorylation is in fact a protective mechanism and is
an attempt to counteract the AF promoting conditions
and prevent remodeling.Our data clearly indicates that phosphorylation of
HSP27 has a role in the pathophysiology of AF,
however, according to current knowledge, it is
impossible to say whether this change is harmful or
beneficial. Since this study was not designed to resolve
this discrepancy, more research is obviously necessary
to determine which of these two contrasting
mechanisms is involved in the pathophysiology of AF.Contrary to data collected from earlier studies using
humanatrial samples, we failed to detect any change in
the level of expression of various HSPs in two canine
models of AF. For example, our study found that there
was no change in expression of HSP25 (an ortholog of
HSP27) while a limited study by Yang et al. detected a
trend, which did not reach significance, towards an
increase in HSP27 expression in 17 patients with AF,
compared to 7 in SR, and concluded that HSP27 may be
associated with different stages of AF (7). Similar
results were also reported by Brundel et al. who found that HSP27 levels were significantly increased in
patients with paroxysmal AF compared to patients in
SR and with persistent AF (5). The conclusion reached
by their study was that increased levels of Hsp27 may
protect against myolysis and slow the progression to
persistent AF. It should be noted that human studies,
especially with a small sample size, do not allow for the
same degree of control and reproducibility as animal
models. The pathophysiology of AF is complex, and the
duration and severity can vary widely between
individuals, which would make data unreliable in small
sample sizes. Differences between these earlier human
studies and our current study could also be the result of
other factors including species variations since unlike
the former; this study involved the use of two well
established canine models. It should also be noted that
the canine subjects were not screened for underlying
cardiac conditions which may have also contributed to
some of the observed variations detected between
individual samples. Therefore, the use of a canine
model is able to limit, but not entirely eliminate,
intersubject variability. Since using animal models
allows for a greater degree of control and
reproducibility, the results from this study are more
reliable compared to those from human studies with a
small sample size. To resolve the differences between
the human studies and our in vivo canine models,
further studies investigating the expression of HSPs
during AF are warranted.
CONCLUSION
Research shows that HSPs have a role in the
pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation. Although our data
shows that the expression levels of HSPs may remain
constant, we demonstrate that there are protein
phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events that
occur in AF that may have important consequences in
its pathophysiology. In the case of HSP27, we detected
a significant decrease in its phosphorylation in a canine
model of CHF. Also note that other HSPs such as
HSP70 and HSP90 are known to be involved in proteinprotein
interactions and are modified under various
physiological conditions (14). Therefore, this study
provides important evidence that requires further
investigation into HSP post-translational modifications
and protein-protein interactions in AF and its relevance
to the pathophysiology of this condition. It will be
necessary to investigate the full scale of HSP
modifications during AF and AF-promoting conditions.
Authors: M A Allessie; P A Boyden; A J Camm; A G Kléber; M J Lab; M J Legato; M R Rosen; P J Schwartz; P M Spooner; D R Van Wagoner ; A L Waldo Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bianca J J M Brundel; Robert H Henning; Lei Ke; Isabelle C van Gelder; Harry J G M Crijns; Harm H Kampinga Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2006-07-31 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: T Rogalla; M Ehrnsperger; X Preville; A Kotlyarov; G Lutsch; C Ducasse; C Paul; M Wieske; A P Arrigo; J Buchner; M Gaestel Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-07-02 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Alfons E Schäfler; Kiriakos Kirmanoglou; Jochen Balbach; Peter Pecher; Andreas Hannekum; Bernd Schumacher Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Prasoon Agarwal; Laura K Cole; Abin Chandrakumar; Kristin D Hauff; Amir Ravandi; Vernon W Dolinsky; Grant M Hatch Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 5.923