Literature DB >> 21263393

Physicians overestimate patient's knowledge of the process of informed consent: a cross-sectional study.

Marko Jukic1, Slavica Kozina, Goran Kardum, Rosemary Hogg, Slavica Kvolik.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the differences in the knowledge and attitudes of physicians and patients regarding the informed consent process.
METHODS: After institutional approval was obtained cohorts of 269 physicians and 265 patients completed a voluntary multiple-choice questionnaire on the informed consent process.
RESULTS: Most of the responses between physicians and patients were significantly different. A total of 77 physicians (30.7%) reported that they personally informed patients about their medical condition and forthcoming clinical procedures in detail and 138 (55%) informed patients as much as necessary. Only 29 patients (11%) reported being informed in detail, and 186 (70.2%) reported that they received only basic information (P < 0.001). Although 132 physicians (52.6%) reported that their patients received sufficient information to be able to decide on their treatment, only 31 patient (11.7%) reported the same (P < 0.001). Half of the doctors (126, 50.2%) reported that they informed their patients in detail on the possible consequences of treatment refusal whereas 23 patients (8.7%) were given such information.
CONCLUSION: There is a great discrepancy between physicians and patients concerning both understanding and knowledge of the informed consent process. The physicians have evaluated their practice of giving information and obtaining informed consent to be more detailed than their patients. The results of this study reflect the need for better communication between doctors and patients as well as physician and patient education programs on the process of informed consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21263393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Glas (Zenica)        ISSN: 1840-0132


  6 in total

1.  An audit of the knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards Surgical Informed Consent (SIC).

Authors:  Bushra Ashraf; Nasira Tasnim; Muhammad Saaiq; Khaleeq-Uz- Zaman
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-27

2.  Patients' Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making: Secondary Analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial.

Authors:  Christoph Becker; Sebastian Gross; Martina Gamp; Katharina Beck; Simon A Amacher; Jonas Mueller; Chantal Bohren; René Blatter; Rainer Schaefert; Philipp Schuetz; Joerg Leuppi; Stefano Bassetti; Sabina Hunziker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  The impact of patient narratives on medical students' perceptions of shared decision making: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie Eggeling; Martina Bientzle; Simone Korger; Joachim Kimmerle
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

4.  Obtaining informed consent from patients hospitalized in the surgical wards as a major legal challenge.

Authors:  Seyed Khosro Ghasempouri; Masoud Shayesteh Azar; Mohammad Hosein Kariminasab; Zakaria Zakariaei; Mohammad Khademloo; Hesamoddin Raeeis Danaei; Benyamin Mohseni Saravi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-17

5.  Are physician-patient communication practices slowly changing in Croatia? -- a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Authors:  Luka Vučemilo; Marko Ćurković; Milan Milošević; Jadranka Mustajbegović; Ana Borovečki
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  A survey of the current practice of the informed consent process in general surgery in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Wouter Kg Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Saskia Houterman; Margot Veerman; Johan Legemaate; Marc R Scheltinga
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-01-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.