Literature DB >> 21262992

Clinical events as a function of proton pump inhibitor use, clopidogrel use, and cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype in a large nationwide cohort of acute myocardial infarction: results from the French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) registry.

Tabassome Simon1, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Martine Gilard, Didier Blanchard, Laurent Bonello, Michel Hanssen, Hervé Lardoux, Pierre Coste, Thierry Lefèvre, Elodie Drouet, Geneviève Mulak, Vincent Bataille, Jean Ferrières, Céline Verstuyft, Nicolas Danchin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel requires metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) that inhibit CYP2C19 are commonly coadministered with clopidogrel to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. This analysis compares treatment outcomes for patients in the French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) who did or did not receive clopidogrel and/or PPIs. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The FAST-MI registry included 3670 patients (2744 clopidogrel- and PPI-naïve patients) presenting with definite MI. Patients were categorized according to use of clopidogrel and/or PPI within 48 hours after hospital admission. PPI use was not associated with an increased risk for any of the main in-hospital events (in-hospital survival, reinfarction, stroke, bleeding, and transfusion). Likewise, PPI treatment was not an independent predictor of 1-year survival (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.08; P=0.57) or 1-year MI, stroke, or death (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.08; P=0.72). No differences were seen when the type of PPI or CYP2C19 genotype was taken into account. In the propensity-matched cohorts, the odds ratios for major in-hospital events in PPI versus no PPI were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.06 to 1.44) and 1.70 (95% CI, 0.10 to 30.3) for patients with 1 and 2 variant alleles, respectively. Similarly, the hazard ratio for 1-year events in hospital survivors was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.26 to 1.79) and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.06 to 5.30), respectively.
CONCLUSION: PPI use was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events or mortality in patients administered clopidogrel for recent MI, whatever the CYP2C19 genotype, although harm could not be formally excluded in patients with 2 loss-of-function alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21262992     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.965640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  38 in total

Review 1.  The clinical relevance of the clopidogrel-proton pump inhibitor interaction.

Authors:  Atif Mohammad; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Rick A Weideman; Bertis B Little; Subhash Banerjee
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Antiplatelet drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Stuart A Scott; Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Jean-Sébastien Hulot
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Proton pump inhibitors and other disease-based factors in the recurrence of adverse cardiovascular events following percutaneous coronary angiography: A long-term cohort.

Authors:  Adil Ayub; Om Parkash; Buria Naeem; Duraiz Murtaza; Aamir Hameed Khan; Wasim Jafri; Saeed Hamid
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-08

Review 4.  Conflicting results between randomized trials and observational studies on the impact of proton pump inhibitors on cardiovascular events when coadministered with dual antiplatelet therapy: systematic review.

Authors:  Chiara Melloni; Jeffrey B Washam; W Schuyler Jones; Sharif A Halim; Victor Hasselblad; Stephanie B Mayer; Brooke L Heidenfelder; Rowena J Dolor
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-01-13

Review 5.  CYP-mediated pharmacologic interference with optimal platelet inhibition.

Authors:  Thomas Cuisset; Jacques Quilici
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Addressing phenoconversion: the Achilles' heel of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Robert L Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Iwakiri; Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Yasuki Habu; Tadayuki Oshima; Noriaki Manabe; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Akihito Nagahara; Osamu Kawamura; Ryuichi Iwakiri; Soji Ozawa; Kiyoshi Ashida; Shuichi Ohara; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Kyoichi Adachi; Kazuhide Higuchi; Hiroto Miwa; Kazuma Fujimoto; Motoyasu Kusano; Yoshio Hoshihara; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Ken Haruma; Michio Hongo; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Clinical evidence of interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Shoa-Lin Lin; Hui-Min Chang; Chun-Peng Liu; Li-Ping Chou; Jaw-Wen Chan
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-26

9.  Drug-drug interaction of rabeprazole and clopidogrel in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Li-Tao Jia; Li-Ming Shao; Jia-Min Chen; Dan-Dan Zhong; Song Xu; Jian-Ting Cai
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Monitoring aspirin and clopidogrel response: testing controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Athanasios Karathanos; Tobias Geisler
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.