Literature DB >> 21262939

The potential economic impact of restricted access to angiotensin-receptor blockers.

Jason R Guertin1, Cynthia A Jackevicius, Jafna L Cox, Karin Humphries, Louise Pilote, Derek Y So, Jack V Tu, Harindra Wijeysundera, Stéphane Rinfret.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of angiotensin-receptor blockers increased by more than 4000% in Canada from 1996 to 2006. The benefit of these medications over angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has not been proven aside from a reduction in dry cough. We estimated the potential cost savings that might have been achieved had access to angiotensin-receptor blockers been restricted.
METHODS: We performed a cost-minimization analysis with a decision-tree model using a societal perspective over a one-year period. Sources of data for model parameters included IMS Health Canada data collected from one-third of all retail pharmacies for the cost and use of angiotensin-receptor blockers and ACE inhibitors in each province, as well as published studies for administrative costs and incidence of dry cough. We used Monte Carlo simulations with 10 000 iterations to test the impact of several model parameters (e.g., drug prices, administrative costs and the incidence of dry cough). All data are in 2006 Canadian dollars.
RESULTS: A policy that would have restricted access to angiotensin-receptor blockers might have saved more than $77 million in Canada in 2006. The simulations yielded similar savings for the year (mean $58.3 million, 95% confidence interval $29.3 million to $90.8 million). Every simulation showed a cost savings.
INTERPRETATION: Had access to angiotensin-receptor blockers been restricted, the potential cost savings to the Canadian health care system might have been more than $77 million in 2006, likely without any adverse effect on cardiovascular health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21262939      PMCID: PMC3042476          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.100787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  17 in total

Review 1.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Peter V Dicpinigaitis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Meta-analysis: angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure and high-risk acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Victor C Lee; David C Rhew; Michelle Dylan; Enkhe Badamgarav; Glenn D Braunstein; Scott R Weingarten
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice?

Authors:  Bo Carlberg; Ola Samuelsson; Lars Hjalmar Lindholm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.

Authors:  Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Hans Ibsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension.

Authors:  David B Matchar; Douglas C McCrory; Lori A Orlando; Manesh R Patel; Uptal D Patel; Meenal B Patwardhan; Benjamin Powers; Gregory P Samsa; Rebecca N Gray
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use: outcome after switching to a different treatment.

Authors:  Marco Cicardi; Lorenza C Zingale; Luigi Bergamaschini; Angelo Agostoni
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-04-26

7.  Mortality rates in elderly patients who take different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction: a class effect?

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Michal Abrahamowicz; Eric Rodrigues; Mark J Eisenberg; Elham Rahme
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Net health plan savings from reference pricing for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in elderly British Columbia residents.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Colin Dormuth; Paul Grootendorst; Stephen B Soumerai; Malcolm Maclure
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Yuhui Zheng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Restrictive access to clopidogrel and mortality following coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Odile Sheehy; Jacques LeLorier; Stéphane Rinfret
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  5 in total

1.  Money left on the table: generic drug prices in Canada.

Authors:  Michael R Law
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2013-02

2.  Angiotensin-receptor-blocker research blocked by too many assumptions.

Authors:  Daniel Lalla
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

Authors:  Walid F Gellad; C Bernie Good
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  What differentiates primary care physicians who predominantly prescribe diuretics for treating mild to moderate hypertension from those who do not? A comparative qualitative study.

Authors:  Christian M Rochefort; Julia Morlec; Robyn M Tamblyn
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Persistence with Antihypertensive Medications in Uncomplicated Treatment-Naïve Patients: Effects of Initial Therapeutic Classes.

Authors:  Young-Mi Ah; Ju-Yeun Lee; Yun-Jung Choi; Baegeum Kim; Kyung Hee Choi; Jisun Kong; Jung Mi Oh; Wan Gyoon Shin; Hae-Young Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.