OBJECTIVE: In the present study, 3 different methods to measure the mitral valve area (MVA) after mitral valve repair (MVRep) were studied. Data obtained immediately after repair were compared with postoperative data. The objective was to determine the feasibility and correlation between intraoperative and postoperative MVA data. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five elective adult surgical patients scheduled for MVRep. METHODS: Echocardiographic data included MVAs obtained using the pressure half-time (PHT), 2-dimensional planimetry (2D-PLAN), and the continuity equation (CE). These data were obtained immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass and were compared with data obtained before hospital discharge (transthoracic echocardiogram 1) and 6 to 12 months after surgery (transthoracic echocardiogram 2). Intraoperative care was guided by hemodynamic goals designed to optimize cardiac function. RESULTS: The data show good agreement and correlation between MVA obtained with PHT and 2D-PLAN within and between each time period. MVA data obtained with the CE in the postoperative period were lower than and did not correlate or agree as well with other MVA data. CONCLUSION: The MVA recorded immediately after valve repair, using PHT, correlated and agreed with MVA data obtained in the postoperative period. These results contrast with previously published data and could highlight the impact of hemodynamic function during the assessment of MVA.
OBJECTIVE: In the present study, 3 different methods to measure the mitral valve area (MVA) after mitral valve repair (MVRep) were studied. Data obtained immediately after repair were compared with postoperative data. The objective was to determine the feasibility and correlation between intraoperative and postoperative MVA data. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five elective adult surgical patients scheduled for MVRep. METHODS: Echocardiographic data included MVAs obtained using the pressure half-time (PHT), 2-dimensional planimetry (2D-PLAN), and the continuity equation (CE). These data were obtained immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass and were compared with data obtained before hospital discharge (transthoracic echocardiogram 1) and 6 to 12 months after surgery (transthoracic echocardiogram 2). Intraoperative care was guided by hemodynamic goals designed to optimize cardiac function. RESULTS: The data show good agreement and correlation between MVA obtained with PHT and 2D-PLAN within and between each time period. MVA data obtained with the CE in the postoperative period were lower than and did not correlate or agree as well with other MVA data. CONCLUSION: The MVA recorded immediately after valve repair, using PHT, correlated and agreed with MVA data obtained in the postoperative period. These results contrast with previously published data and could highlight the impact of hemodynamic function during the assessment of MVA.
Authors: Ann K Riegel; Raila Busch; Scott Segal; John A Fox; Holger K Eltzschig; Stanton K Shernan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Muhammad Shabsigh; Cassidy Lawrence; Byron R Rosero-Britton; Nicolas Kumar; Satoshi Kimura; Michael Andrew Durda; Michael Essandoh Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2016-04-21