Literature DB >> 21262233

Converting a marginally hydrophobic soluble protein into a membrane protein.

Morten H H Nørholm1, Fiona Cunningham, Charles M Deber, Gunnar von Heijne.   

Abstract

δ-Helices are marginally hydrophobic α-helical segments in soluble proteins that exhibit certain sequence characteristics of transmembrane (TM) helices [Cunningham, F., Rath, A., Johnson, R. M. & Deber, C. M. (2009). Distinctions between hydrophobic helices in globular proteins and TM segments as factors in protein sorting. J. Biol. Chem., 284, 5395-402]. In order to better understand the difference between δ-helices and TM helices, we have studied the insertion of five TM-like δ-helices into dog pancreas microsomal membranes. Using model constructs in which an isolated δ-helix is engineered into a bona fide membrane protein, we find that, for two δ-helices originating from secreted proteins, at least three single-nucleotide mutations are necessary to obtain efficient membrane insertion, whereas one mutation is sufficient in a δ-helix from the cytosolic protein P450BM-3. We further find that only when the entire upstream region of the mutated δ-helix in the intact cytochrome P450BM-3 is deleted does a small fraction of the truncated protein insert into microsomes. Our results suggest that upstream portions of the polypeptide, as well as embedded charged residues, protect δ-helices in globular proteins from being recognized by the signal recognition particle-Sec61 endoplasmic-reticulum-targeting machinery and that δ-helices in secreted proteins are mutationally more distant from TM helices than δ-helices in cytosolic proteins.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21262233     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  3 in total

1.  Flanking residues help determine whether a hydrophobic segment adopts a monotopic or bitopic topology in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

Authors:  Morten H H Nørholm; Yulia V Shulga; Satoko Aoki; Richard M Epand; Gunnar von Heijne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 5.486

Review 2.  Life at the border: adaptation of proteins to anisotropic membrane environment.

Authors:  Irina D Pogozheva; Henry I Mosberg; Andrei L Lomize
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Mechanisms of CFTR Folding at the Endoplasmic Reticulum.

Authors:  Soo Jung Kim; William R Skach
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.810

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.