| Literature DB >> 21261917 |
Anna N Kulakova1, Leonid A Kulakov, John W McGrath, John P Quinn.
Abstract
The phnA gene that encodes theEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 21261917 PMCID: PMC3815843 DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00082.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Figure 1Construction of the PA biosensor plasmid pPANT3. A 1108 bp fragment from the genome of P. fluorescens 23F containing the phnR gene together with the phnA regulatory region was amplified by PCR and cloned into the HindIII‐SacI sites of the promoter probe vector pPROBE‐NT. km, kanamycin‐resistance gene of pPROBE‐NT; T1 and T4, rrnB1 transcriptional terminators of E. coli. ΔphnA, first 29 nt of the phnA gene.
Induction of GFP expression in DH5α (pPANT3) by phosphonoacetate.
| Growth/induction medium | Induction time (h) | GFP induction ratio (mean ± SD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | ||
| Solidified (agar): | |||||||
| LB | 24 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 1.1 |
| LB | 72 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 18.1 ± 2.6 |
| 0.25 LB | 24 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 1.1 | 10.3 ± 1.6 |
| 0.25 LB | 48 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.7 | 7.7 ± 17 |
| 0.25 LB | 72 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 2.2 |
| Liquid (broth): | |||||||
| LB | 24 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | ND | 18.6 ± 1.9 | 28.2 ± 3.0 | ND |
| LB | 48 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 14.5 ± 4.3 | 23.9 ± 1.3 | 34.2 ± 3.0 | ND |
| 0.25 LB | 24 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 0.25 LB | 48 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
| 0.1 LB | 24 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | ND | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.5 |
| 0.1 LB | 48 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | ND | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 4.0 ± 0.4 |
Induction ratios were calculated as SFUx/SFUo, where SFUx is the specific fluorescence of the sample in the presence of the inducer and SFUo is the specific fluorescence of the uninduced control sample at the same time point. A value of 1.0 therefore corresponds to no fluorescence being detected.
Values represent means of three independent experiments.
Underlining of values shows that there is a statistically significant increase in fluorescence (P < 0.05) over the no‐inducer control (based on a paired t‐test).
ND, not determined.
Figure 2Induction of gfp in E. coli DH5α (pPANT3) in the presence of PA (light grey), phosphonoacetaldehyde (white) and arsonoacetate (dark grey). Induction ratio was calculated as SFUx/SFUo, where SFUx refers to the sample containing the inducer and SFUo to the control sample at the same time point: a value of 1.0 corresponds to no fluorescence being detected. Specific fluorescence (SFU) was calculated as described in Experimental procedures. All measurements were made in triplicate. Error bars represent a standard deviation of the mean (n = 3).
Figure 3Kinetics of GFP expression in E. coli DHα (pPANT3) and P. putida KT2440 (pPANT3). The concentration of phosphonoacetate was 100 µM. Induction ratios were calculated as described in Fig. 2 and in Experimental procedures. , GFP induction ratio in P. putida KT2440 (pPANT3); (‐○‐), GFP induction ratio in E. coli DH5α (pPANT3). Error bars represent a standard deviation of triplicate measurements.