Literature DB >> 21259367

Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) total and extravascular signal changes and ΔR2* in human visual cortex at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T.

Manus J Donahue1, Hans Hoogduin, Peter C M van Zijl, Peter Jezzard, Peter R Luijten, Jeroen Hendrikse.   

Abstract

The characterisation of the extravascular (EV) contribution to the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) effect is important for understanding the spatial specificity of BOLD contrast and for modelling approaches that aim to extract quantitative metabolic parameters from the BOLD signal. Using bipolar crusher gradients, total (b = 0 s/mm(2) ) and predominantly EV (b = 100 s/mm(2) ) gradient echo BOLD ΔR(2)* and signal changes (ΔS/S) in response to visual stimulation (flashing checkerboard; f = 8 Hz) were investigated sequentially (within < 3 h) at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T in the same subgroup of healthy volunteers (n = 7) and at identical spatial resolutions (3.5 × 3.5 × 3.5 mm(3)). Total ΔR(2)* (z-score analysis) values were -0.61 ± 0.10 s(-1) (1.5 T), -0.74 ± 0.05 s(-1) (3.0 T) and -1.37 ± 0.12 s(-1) (7.0 T), whereas EV ΔR(2)* values were -0.28 ± 0.07 s(-1) (1.5 T), -0.52 ± 0.07 s(-1) (3.0 T) and -1.25 ± 0.11 s(-1) (7.0 T). Although EV ΔR(2)* increased linearly with field, as expected, it was found that EV ΔS/S increased less than linearly with field in a manner that varied with TE choice. Furthermore, unlike ΔR(2)*, total and EV ΔS/S did not converge at 7.0 T. These trends were similar whether a z-score analysis or occipital lobe-based region-of-interest approach was used for voxel selection. These findings suggest that calibrated BOLD approaches may benefit from an EV ΔR(2)* measurement as opposed to a ΔS/S measurement at a single TE.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21259367     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  27 in total

Review 1.  Biophysical and physiological origins of blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI signals.

Authors:  Seong-Gi Kim; Seiji Ogawa
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  The Contribution of Common Surgically Implanted Hardware to Functional MR Imaging Artifacts.

Authors:  A A Desai; M K Strother; C C Faraco; V L Morgan; T R Ladner; L M Dethrage; L C Jordan; M J Donahue
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  The physics of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Authors:  Richard B Buxton
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2013-09-04

5.  More than BOLD: Dual-spin populations create functional contrast.

Authors:  Amanda J Taylor; Jung H Kim; Vimal Singh; Elizabeth J Halfen; Josef Pfeuffer; David Ress
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The cumulative influence of hyperoxia and hypercapnia on blood oxygenation and R*₂.

Authors:  Carlos C Faraco; Megan K Strother; Jeroen C W Siero; Daniel F Arteaga; Allison O Scott; Lori C Jordan; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Dual echo vessel-encoded ASL for simultaneous BOLD and CBF reactivity assessment in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Carlos C Faraco; Megan K Strother; Lindsey M Dethrage; Lori Jordan; Robert Singer; Paul F Clemmons; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Joint design of large-tip-angle parallel RF pulses and blipped gradient trajectories.

Authors:  Zhipeng Cao; Manus J Donahue; Jun Ma; William A Grissom
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Noise concerns and post-processing procedures in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Meher R Juttukonda; Jennifer M Watchmaker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Quantitative β mapping for calibrated fMRI.

Authors:  Christina Y Shu; Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Daniel Coman; Peter Herman; Douglas L Rothman; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.