| Literature DB >> 21258429 |
Janneke E Witteveen1, Harm R Haak, Job Kievit, Hans Morreau, Johannes A Romijn, Neveen A T Hamdy.
Abstract
A 29-year-old man presented to his primary care physician with nausea, severe weight loss and muscle weakness. He had a hard, fixed neck swelling. He was severely hypercalcaemic with 10-fold increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. A diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism was established and the patient was referred for parathyroidectomy. At neck exploration, an enlarged parathyroid gland with invasive growth into the thyroid gland was found and removed, lymph nodes were cleared and hemithyroidectomy was performed. A suspected diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma was confirmed histologically. Serum calcium and PTH levels normalised post-operatively, but hyperparathyroidism recurred within 3 years of surgery. Over the following 17 years, control of hypercalcaemia represented the most difficult challenge despite variable success achieved with repeated surgical interventions, embolisations, radiofrequency ablation of metastases and treatment with calcimimetics, bisphosphonates and haemodialysis using low-dialysate calcium. In this paper, we report the challenges and pitfalls we encountered in the management of our patient over nearly two decades of follow-up and review recent literature on the topic.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21258429 PMCID: PMC3000473 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-010-0042-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Horm Cancer ISSN: 1868-8497 Impact factor: 3.869
Overview of cases of parathyroid carcinoma published between 2001 and 2010
| Author | Age/sex | Number of operations | Radiotherapy | Chemotherapy | Embolisation | Radiofrequency ablation | PTH immunisation | Calcitonin | Cinacalcet | Bisphosphonates | Development of local recurrence or distant metastasis | Outcome | Follow-up (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Savli [ | 47/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 1 | ||||||||
| Tyler [ | 44/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | A/FOD | 5.5 | |||||||
| Dotzenrath [ | 43/M | 4 | Yes | Yes | DOD | 12 | |||||||
| 43/F | 12 | Yes | Yes | A/WD | 8 | ||||||||
| 62/F | 2 | Yes | D/other | 9.5 | |||||||||
| Yamashita [ | 43/M | 2 | Yes | A/WD | 12 | ||||||||
| Eurelings [ | 45/F | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | DOD | 4 | ||||||
| Brown [ | 51/M | 2 | No | A/FOD | 2 | ||||||||
| Bhansali [ | 40/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | DOD | 0.5 | |||||
| Hundley [ | 33/F | 5 | Yes | A/FOD | 20 | ||||||||
| Schmidt [ | 76/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 1 | ||||||||
| Schoretsanitis [ | 55/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 2 | ||||||||
| Dionisi [ | 35/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | DOD | 4 | |||||||
| Rufener [ | 67/M | 3 | Yes | A/FOD | 4 | ||||||||
| Munson [ | 41/F | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 5.5 | |||||||
| 46/F | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 4.5 | ||||||||
| 49/F | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 5.5 | ||||||||
| 57/F | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 4.5 | ||||||||
| Dogan [ | 50/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 1.5 | ||||||||
| Betea [ | 50/F | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A/WD | 11 | |||||
| Kern [ | 54/F | 2 | Yes | Yes | DOD | 2.5 | |||||||
| Kirkby-Bott [ | 44/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | DOD | 3.5 | ||||||
| 70/M | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 7 | ||||||||
| 36/F | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 5 | ||||||||
| 66/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | DOD | 8 | ||||||||
| 46/M | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | A/WD | 1 | |||||||
| 25/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 1 | |||||||||
| 44/M | 1 | No | A/FOD | 1 | |||||||||
| Lin [ | 38/M | 1 | No | A/FOD | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Ahmad [ | 42/F | 1 | Yes | Yes | A/FOD | 1 | |||||||
| Chiofalo [ | 66/M | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 1 | |||||||
| Cheah [ | 32/M | 2 | No | A/FOD | 0.5 | ||||||||
| 42/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 0.5 | |||||||||
| 52/F | 2 | Yes | A/FOD | 5.5 | |||||||||
| Yoshida [ | 61/F | 2 | Yes | Yes | A/WD | 18.5 | |||||||
| Ikeda [ | 48/M | 4 | Yes | Yes | A/WD | 6 | |||||||
| Pahlavan [ | 21/M | 2 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 2 | |||||||
| Agarwal [ | 22/F | 2 | Yes | A/FOD | 9 | ||||||||
| Mezhir [ | 64/F | 7 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A/FOD | 8 | |||||
| Placzkowski [ | 51/F | 4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A/FOD | 12 | ||||
| Sahasranam [ | 53/M | 1 | No | A/FOD | 2 | ||||||||
| Tkaczyk [ | 55/M | 2 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 1 | |||||||
| Tan [ | 55/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Iwata [ | 61/M | 1 | No | A/FOD | 3 | ||||||||
| Montenegro [ | 50/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | DOD | 5 | ||||||
| Rathi [ | 45/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Artinyan [ | 71/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A/FOD | 0.5 | ||||
| Cetani [ | 53/M | 3 | Yes | Yes | A/FOD | 2 | |||||||
| Temmim [ | 63/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 2 | ||||||||
| Tamura [ | 70/M | 1 | Yes | A/WD | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Schoretsanitis [ | 72/M | 1 | No | A/FOD | 4 | ||||||||
| 78/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 4 | |||||||||
| 55/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 6 | |||||||||
| 71/M | 1 | Yes | DOD | 2 | |||||||||
| 75/M | 1 | No | A/FOD | 4 | |||||||||
| Kung [ | 72/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 2 | ||||||||
| Marcy [ | 42/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 1 | ||||||||
| Yuan [ | 38/F | 2 | No | A/FOD | 4 | ||||||||
| Rock [ | 60/M | 1 | Yes | No | A/FOD | 0.5 | |||||||
| Yong [ | 23/M | 1 | Yes | Yes | No | A/FOD | 2 | ||||||
| Chaychi [ | 79/F | 1 | No | A/FOD | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Tochio [ | 42/M | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | A/WD | 8.5 | ||||||
| 51 ± 2/30M:32F | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 18/62 (29%) | 4/62 (6%) | 1/62 (2%) | 3/62 (5%) | 1/62 (2%) | 3/62 (5%) | 5/62 (8%) | 14/62 (23%) | 27/62 (44%) | 4.3 ± 0.5 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SE
DOD dead of disease, D/other dead of other cause, A/WD alive with disease, A/FOD alive free of disease
Fig. 1Disease course of our patient spanning over 17 years
Fig. 2Radiological (a pre-RF ablation, b after RF ablation) and biochemical changes after RF ablation of the lung metastasis, demonstrating a severe drop in serum PTH concentrations, which persisted for almost a year
Fig. 3Radiological and biochemical changes following lobectomy of the lung metastasis, which resulted in only partial improvement in serum calcium and PTH concentrations
Fig. 4CT scan of the thorax demonstrating a large (4 ×3 × 2 cm) subcarinal mediastinal lymph node metastasis (white arrow) (a, b), which was successfully excised using a transpericardial approach (c)