Literature DB >> 21258127

Women's preferences for the delivery of the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme: a cross-sectional survey.

Louise Linsell1, Lindsay J L Forbes, Julietta Patnick, Jane Wardle, Joan Austoker, Amanda J Ramirez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To elicit women's preferences for delivery of the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme.
DESIGN: Interview survey.
SETTING: Private households in the UK. POPULATION: Five hundred and ninety-seven women aged 45-75 interviewed as part of the National Statistics Omnibus Survey, December 2008 and January 2009. OUTCOMES: Preferred setting (hospital or community) and preferred type of screening unit (mobile or permanent). Rated importance of distance, time, convenience and cost of travelling to a screening unit.
RESULTS: Forty per cent of women did not mind whether the screening unit was based in a community or hospital setting, and 52% did not mind whether the unit was permanent or mobile. Among those who expressed a preference, 59% preferred a hospital to a community setting, and 62% preferred a permanent to a mobile unit. Many women (63%) said distance to a breast screening unit was an important factor, as was time to travel (58%). Among those with access to a car, 80% regarded the availability of parking as important, but only 40% regarded the cost of car travel as important. Among women with no access to a car, there was a similar pattern for ease of public transport (76%) and cost of public transport (48%).
CONCLUSIONS: Many women were unconcerned about the type and setting of breast screening units. Among those who were concerned, most preferred hospital over community settings and permanent over mobile units, but nonetheless most women said time and distance were important. Well-situated units with advanced publicity about public transport links and parking facilities may encourage greater uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21258127     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2010.010037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  6 in total

1.  Clinical breast examination as the recommended breast cancer screening modality in a rural community in Malaysia; what are the factors that could enhance its uptake?

Authors:  Nik Daliana Nik Farid; Norlaili Abdul Aziz; Nabilla Al-Sadat; Mariam Jamaludin; Maznah Dahlui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Colposcopy attendance and deprivation: A retrospective analysis of 27,193 women in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.

Authors:  E Douglas; J Wardle; N J Massat; J Waller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Non-attendance of mammographic screening: the roles of age and municipality in a population-based Swedish sample.

Authors:  Maria Norfjord Zidar; Peter Larm; Per Tillgren; Sharareh Akhavan
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-12-30

4.  Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates-Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a 'One Stop' Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer.

Authors:  Amanda Bobridge; Kay Price; Tiffany K Gill; Anne W Taylor
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography in Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Chi Phuong Nguyen; Eddy M M Adang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Developing a discrete choice experiment in Malawi: eliciting preferences for breast cancer early detection services.

Authors:  Racquel E Kohler; Clara N Lee; Satish Gopal; Bryce B Reeve; Bryan J Weiner; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.